Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
829 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 829 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 829 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Nicklow Mary Ann's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nicklow Mary Ann's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 829 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nicklow Mary Ann's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nicklow Mary Ann's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
05:53.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 829 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Mary Ann Nicklow's performance in the 2024 New York HYROX race within the 50-54 age group was commendable, securing an overall rank of 329 out of 1486 athletes, placing her in the top 22%. Specifically, within her age group, she achieved an 11th place finish, marking her performance in the top 15%. A standout aspect of her performance was her strength in the sled pull and wall balls segments, where she outranked most competitors. However, her total running time was 03:41 slower than average, indicating a potential area for improvement. Despite a strong start in the initial running segment, subsequent runs showed a decline in pace, suggesting a potential issue with stamina or pacing. Her profile appears to be more strength-oriented, given her excellent performance in strength exercises contrasted with slower running times.
Segments to Improve:
Total Running Time: Mary’s total running time was notably slower than the average, suggesting room for improvement in her running efficiency and endurance. To improve, she should incorporate interval training into her routine, consisting of short bursts of high-intensity running followed by recovery periods. This can help improve her VO2 max and running economy. Additionally, incorporating hill sprints can enhance her leg strength and stamina, potentially improving her running pace in subsequent segments.
Roxzone: The slower Roxzone time indicates longer transition times between exercises or additional rest periods. Improving overall fitness through a combination of cardiovascular and strength training can help. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions that mimic the race's structure—alternating between strength exercises and short running or rowing intervals—could improve her transition efficiency. Practicing specific transition drills, where she quickly moves from one exercise to the next, can also reduce Roxzone time.
Rowing: Being slightly slower than average in the rowing segment, Mary could benefit from focusing on her rowing technique and power. Drills that emphasize a strong leg drive and proper body sequencing can improve her efficiency on the rower. Incorporating power row intervals, where she focuses on maintaining a high watt output for short durations, can also enhance her rowing performance.
Race Strategies:
Pacing: Given the tendency to start strong and then slow down, Mary should focus on finding a sustainable pace that she can maintain throughout the race. Practicing pacing strategies during training, where she aims to keep a consistent pace across all running segments, can be beneficial. She should start at a conservative pace and gradually increase her speed if she feels capable, especially in the latter parts of the race.
Transitions: Reducing Roxzone time can be crucial for Mary's overall performance. She should practice quick transitions between running and strength exercises during her training sessions. Setting up a mock race course that simulates the HYROX event layout can help her become more efficient in moving from one segment to the next without unnecessary delays.
Strength and Endurance Balance: Since Mary shows a strong inclination towards strength segments, she should not neglect her running endurance. Incorporating long runs into her weekly training, at a slower pace than her race pace, can help build endurance without sacrificing strength gains. Additionally, workouts that combine strength and cardio in a single session can help improve her ability to maintain a strong performance throughout the race.
By focusing on these targeted areas of improvement and implementing the suggested strategies and exercises, Mary Ann Nicklow can expect to see significant enhancements in her HYROX race performance, particularly in running efficiency, transition times, and overall fitness level.
Race History
Explore your race history splits in detail below.
The interactive chart provides an easy way to analyze your performance by highlighting faster and slower times across each split.
This tool is designed to help you identify trends, track improvements, and refine your strategy for future races.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women