Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mountney Amy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mountney Amy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mountney Amy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mountney Amy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:38 | 43:22 to 40:44 | 46.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:21 | 06:05 to 04:44 | 24.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:54 | 04:48 to 03:54 | 16.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:41 | 05:16 to 04:35 | 12.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 01:58 to 01:54 | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:25 to 01:25 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 02:46 to 02:46 | 0.0% |
| Mountney Amy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:56 | 00:00 | 04:43 +00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 04:56 | 04:56 -00:34 | 04:43 +00:13 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 09:18 | 05:02 -00:02 | 09:39 -00:21 |
| Sled Push | 01:25 | 14:18 | 02:30 -01:05 | 14:41 -00:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:25 | 15:43 | 05:18 +00:07 | 17:11 -01:28 |
| Sled Pull | 05:16 | 21:08 | 05:09 +00:07 | 22:29 -01:21 |
| Running 4 | 05:31 | 26:24 | 05:19 +00:12 | 27:38 -01:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:05 | 31:55 | 05:18 +00:47 | 32:57 -01:02 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 38:00 | 05:26 +00:05 | 38:15 -00:15 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 43:31 | 05:09 -00:28 | 43:41 -00:10 |
| Running 6 | 05:44 | 48:12 | 05:21 +00:23 | 48:50 -00:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 53:56 | 02:05 -00:07 | 54:11 -00:15 |
| Running 7 | 05:32 | 55:54 | 05:19 +00:13 | 56:16 -00:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:48 | 01:01:26 | 04:15 +00:33 | 01:01:35 -00:09 |
| Running 8 | 05:46 | 01:06:14 | 05:37 +00:09 | 01:05:50 +00:24 |
| Wall Balls | 02:46 | 01:12:00 | 04:17 -01:31 | 01:11:27 +00:33 |
| Roxzone | 07:00 | 01:21:39 | 05:55 +01:05 | 01:21:39 |
Amy Mountney delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox, finishing in the top 8% overall and top 11% in her age group. Her strength in exercises such as the Ski Erg and Wall Balls is particularly noteworthy, where she ranked in the top percentile. However, her total running time was slightly slower than average, suggesting that she possesses a balanced profile with potential to improve both running and strength to achieve an even better performance. The Roxzone time was significantly slower than average, indicating potential areas for improvement in transitions. Additionally, her initial running segments suggest a steady, albeit slightly slower start compared to the average, which can be adjusted for more strategic pacing.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Penzo Alessia | 2024 Milan | 01:21:13 | |
| Adamczewska Alicja | 2024 Gdansk | 01:22:02 | |
| Thiedemann Anke | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:21:22 | |
| Gretzki Julia | 2023 Hamburg | 01:21:19 | |
| Zeglin Evi | 2021 Berlin | 01:21:53 | |
| Kaneva Elena | 2024 Berlin | 01:21:24 | |
| Love Halle | 2024 Melbourne | 01:22:06 | |
| Åström Jessica | 2024 Malaga | 01:21:18 | |
| Schwartz Talia | 2022 Dallas | 01:21:18 | |
| Geers Linda | 2024 Maastricht | 01:21:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
