Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Moss Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Moss Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Moss Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Moss Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:25 | 07:03 to 05:38 | 47.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:33 | 05:56 to 05:23 | 18.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 02:41 to 02:20 | 11.7% |
| Rowing | 00:19 | 05:18 to 04:59 | 10.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:15 | 06:15 to 06:00 | 8.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:06 | 07:18 to 07:12 | 3.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:52 to 02:52 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:17 to 44:17 | 0.0% |
| Moss Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:50 | 00:00 | 04:57 +00:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 05:50 | 04:35 -00:08 | 04:57 +00:53 |
| Running 2 | 05:10 | 10:17 | 05:23 -00:13 | 09:32 +00:45 |
| Sled Push | 02:52 | 15:27 | 03:13 -00:21 | 14:55 +00:32 |
| Running 3 | 05:14 | 18:19 | 05:51 -00:37 | 18:08 +00:11 |
| Sled Pull | 05:56 | 23:33 | 05:33 +00:23 | 23:59 -00:26 |
| Running 4 | 05:25 | 29:29 | 05:52 -00:27 | 29:32 -00:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:15 | 34:54 | 06:16 -00:01 | 35:24 -00:30 |
| Running 5 | 05:33 | 41:09 | 06:06 -00:33 | 41:40 -00:31 |
| Rowing | 05:18 | 46:42 | 05:03 +00:15 | 47:46 -01:04 |
| Running 6 | 05:36 | 52:00 | 05:55 -00:19 | 52:49 -00:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:41 | 57:36 | 02:26 +00:15 | 58:44 -01:08 |
| Running 7 | 05:32 | 01:00:17 | 05:54 -00:22 | 01:01:10 -00:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:03 | 01:05:49 | 05:52 +01:11 | 01:07:04 -01:15 |
| Running 8 | 06:00 | 01:12:52 | 06:50 -00:50 | 01:12:56 -00:04 |
| Wall Balls | 07:18 | 01:18:52 | 07:35 -00:17 | 01:19:46 -00:54 |
| Roxzone | 09:27 | 01:35:30 | 08:09 +01:18 | 01:35:30 |
Paul Moss performed well in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, placing in the top 48% of all athletes and top 44% of his age group (55-59). His overall time was 01:35:30, demonstrating a strong level of fitness and tenacity.
Paul's total running time was 00:44:17, which is 02:48 faster than the average time, indicating that his running capability is a clear strength. In fact, his best running lap was 00:05:10, further highlighting his speed and endurance on the running segments.
However, Paul's performance in the Roxzone, which measures the time spent between exercise zones, was 00:09:27, which is 01:24 slower than average. This indicates that he took more time to transition between exercises, which affected his overall time.
During the race, Paul should:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schroeder Dustin | 2024 Hamburg | 01:35:43 | |
| Mena González Abel | 2024 Madrid | 01:35:53 | |
| Wandell Patrik | 2024 Malaga | 01:35:16 | |
| Argentino Mattia | 2024 Rimini | 01:35:02 | |
| Elson Mark | 2021 London | 01:35:20 | |
| Murkett Peter | 2024 Gdansk | 01:35:34 | |
| Busching Paul | 2022 Chicago | 01:35:35 | |
| Conter Philip | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:35:06 | |
| Divers Phil | 2024 Paris | 01:35:06 | |
| Fairbrother K | 2023 Dallas | 01:35:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
