Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lynn Tom's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lynn Tom's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lynn Tom's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lynn Tom's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:27 | 46:14 to 39:47 | 90.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:25 | 04:59 to 04:34 | 5.8% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 04:54 to 04:37 | 4.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:23 to 01:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:29 to 01:29 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:00 to 04:00 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:00 to 04:00 | 0.0% |
| Lynn Tom | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:45 | 00:00 | 04:28 +00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:09 | 04:45 | 04:23 -00:14 | 04:28 +00:17 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 08:54 | 04:46 +00:14 | 08:51 +00:03 |
| Sled Push | 01:23 | 13:54 | 02:46 -01:23 | 13:37 +00:17 |
| Running 3 | 05:55 | 15:17 | 05:10 +00:45 | 16:23 -01:06 |
| Sled Pull | 04:02 | 21:12 | 04:39 -00:37 | 21:33 -00:21 |
| Running 4 | 06:16 | 25:14 | 05:08 +01:08 | 26:12 -00:58 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:59 | 31:30 | 04:57 +00:02 | 31:20 +00:10 |
| Running 5 | 06:23 | 36:29 | 05:17 +01:06 | 36:17 +00:12 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 42:52 | 04:43 +00:11 | 41:34 +01:18 |
| Running 6 | 06:03 | 47:46 | 05:11 +00:52 | 46:17 +01:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:29 | 53:49 | 02:05 -00:36 | 51:28 +02:21 |
| Running 7 | 05:49 | 55:18 | 05:09 +00:40 | 53:33 +01:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:00 | 01:01:07 | 04:50 -00:50 | 58:42 +02:25 |
| Running 8 | 06:07 | 01:05:07 | 05:40 +00:27 | 01:03:32 +01:35 |
| Wall Balls | 04:00 | 01:11:14 | 06:04 -02:04 | 01:09:12 +02:02 |
| Roxzone | 06:29 | 01:21:35 | 06:19 +00:10 | 01:21:35 |
Tom Lynn demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, achieving an overall rank of 400, placing him in the top 22% of all participants. In his age group, he ranked 29th, showcasing his potential among peers. While his strength exercises, such as the Sled Push and Wall Balls, were outstanding, his total running time was notably slower than average by 05:01, indicating a need for improvement in running efficiency. Tom's initial running segments suggest he may have started at a moderate pace but slowed down significantly by Running 3, indicating potential fatigue or pacing issues. Based on these results, Tom appears to have a more strength-oriented profile, excelling in power-based exercises but requiring enhancement in his running capabilities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Massot Andreu | 2023 Malaga | 01:21:44 | |
| Wright Martyn | 2022 Birmingham | 01:22:02 | |
| Hinz Thomas | 2022 Hamburg | 01:22:05 | |
| Omes Boris | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:21:12 | |
| Cázares Carlos | 2024 Mexico City | 01:22:05 | |
| Schulz Patrick | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:22:01 | |
| Filliol Bastien | 2024 Marseille | 01:21:33 | |
| Moulin Stephane | 2024 Marseille | 01:21:37 | |
| Van Dijk Robert | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:21:53 | |
| Fettig Lukas | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:21:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
