Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Long Luke's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Long Luke's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Long Luke's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Long Luke's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:14 | 38:27 to 35:13 | 63.0% |
| Sled Pull | 01:26 | 05:00 to 03:34 | 27.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:24 | 04:08 to 03:44 | 7.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:04 | 04:39 to 04:35 | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:52 to 03:52 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:09 to 01:09 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:17 to 03:17 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:37 to 01:37 | 0.0% |
| Long Luke | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:20 | 00:00 | 04:03 +00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:52 | 04:20 | 04:13 -00:21 | 04:03 +00:17 |
| Running 2 | 04:29 | 08:12 | 04:22 +00:07 | 08:16 -00:04 |
| Sled Push | 01:09 | 12:41 | 02:28 -01:19 | 12:38 +00:03 |
| Running 3 | 04:54 | 13:50 | 04:40 +00:14 | 15:06 -01:16 |
| Sled Pull | 05:00 | 18:44 | 04:03 +00:57 | 19:46 -01:02 |
| Running 4 | 04:47 | 23:44 | 04:38 +00:09 | 23:49 -00:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:17 | 28:31 | 04:08 -00:51 | 28:27 +00:04 |
| Running 5 | 05:00 | 31:48 | 04:46 +00:14 | 32:35 -00:47 |
| Rowing | 04:21 | 36:48 | 04:30 -00:09 | 37:21 -00:33 |
| Running 6 | 04:57 | 41:09 | 04:40 +00:17 | 41:51 -00:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:37 | 46:06 | 01:51 -00:14 | 46:31 -00:25 |
| Running 7 | 04:51 | 47:43 | 04:39 +00:12 | 48:22 -00:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:08 | 52:34 | 04:09 -00:01 | 53:01 -00:27 |
| Running 8 | 05:13 | 56:42 | 05:00 +00:13 | 57:10 -00:28 |
| Wall Balls | 04:39 | 01:01:55 | 05:12 -00:33 | 01:02:10 -00:15 |
| Roxzone | 06:07 | 01:12:32 | 05:10 +00:57 | 01:12:32 |
Luke Long delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 129 and placing in the top 7% of his age group. His performance showcased a strong proficiency in strength-based exercises, evident from his outstanding times in the Sled Push and Ski Erg. However, his running times lagged slightly behind the average, indicating a need for improvement in endurance and pacing. Luke's overall running time was 1:17 slower than average, suggesting his athletic profile leans more towards strength. Additionally, his pacing strategy could benefit from adjustments, as his initial running segments were consistently slower than average, which might hint at a conservative start or fatigue from strength exercises.
By focusing on these targeted areas for improvement and integrating strategic race techniques, Luke can enhance his overall performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson Luke | 2024 Madrid | 01:13:02 | |
| Querlioz Timothe | 2024 Glasgow | 01:13:01 | |
| Blázquez Martín Alberto | 2023 Madrid | 01:12:17 | |
| Guiban Titouan | 2023 Paris | 01:12:22 | |
| Buick James | 2024 Dublin | 01:12:45 | |
| Van Dijk Job | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:12:52 | |
| Wolf Joachim | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:12:09 | |
| Mottram Russell | 2024 Dublin | 01:12:58 | |
| De Marzo Nicholas | 2024 Milan | 01:13:00 | |
| Olde Dirc | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:12:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
