Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 902 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Leo Linda's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Leo Linda's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Leo Linda's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Leo Linda's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:12 | 52:36 to 49:24 | 80.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:29 | 05:47 to 05:18 | 12.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:34 to 02:23 | 4.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:07 | 06:21 to 06:14 | 2.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:30 to 02:30 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:24 to 06:24 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Leo Linda | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:23 | 00:00 | 05:31 -00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 05:23 | 05:17 -00:21 | 05:31 -00:08 |
| Running 2 | 05:55 | 10:19 | 05:56 -00:01 | 10:48 -00:29 |
| Sled Push | 02:30 | 16:14 | 03:01 -00:31 | 16:44 -00:30 |
| Running 3 | 06:22 | 18:44 | 06:17 +00:05 | 19:45 -01:01 |
| Sled Pull | 06:21 | 25:06 | 06:30 -00:09 | 26:02 -00:56 |
| Running 4 | 06:36 | 31:27 | 06:20 +00:16 | 32:32 -01:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:24 | 38:03 | 07:09 -00:45 | 38:52 -00:49 |
| Running 5 | 06:55 | 44:27 | 06:32 +00:23 | 46:01 -01:34 |
| Rowing | 05:27 | 51:22 | 05:37 -00:10 | 52:33 -01:11 |
| Running 6 | 07:01 | 56:49 | 06:25 +00:36 | 58:10 -01:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:34 | 01:03:50 | 02:27 +00:07 | 01:04:35 -00:45 |
| Running 7 | 07:16 | 01:06:24 | 06:23 +00:53 | 01:07:02 -00:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:47 | 01:13:40 | 05:27 +00:20 | 01:13:25 +00:15 |
| Running 8 | 07:13 | 01:19:27 | 07:04 +00:09 | 01:18:52 +00:35 |
| Wall Balls | 05:04 | 01:26:40 | 05:43 -00:39 | 01:25:56 +00:44 |
| Roxzone | 08:08 | 01:39:42 | 08:03 +00:05 | 01:39:42 |
Linda Leo delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 482, placing her in the top 26% of participants. Notably, she ranked 64th in her age group (16-24), which places her in the top 47%. Her overall time of 01:39:42 reflects a strong effort, though there are areas for improvement. The total running time of 00:52:36 was 01:22 slower than the average, indicating that her running could be enhanced. This suggests that Linda exhibits a strong hybrid profile, with proficiency in both strength and endurance segments, yet with room to improve her running efficiency. Linda's pacing showed that she started the race at a good pace but gradually slowed down, especially in later running segments, suggesting a potential need for better energy management throughout the race.
Linda's total running time was slightly slower than average. To improve her running performance, she should focus on building her aerobic capacity and endurance. Incorporating interval training and tempo runs into her routine could be beneficial. Specific exercises include:
Linda's Roxzone time was slower than average, indicating potential inefficiencies in transitions. Drills to enhance this include:
These segments showed potential for improvement. Linda should work on lower body strength and grip endurance. Recommended exercises include:
Linda should focus on maintaining a steady pace throughout the race to avoid fatigue in later segments. Practicing even pacing in training can help her manage energy levels more efficiently during the race.
By refining transition techniques, Linda can save valuable time. Practicing quick transitions in training will help her become more efficient on race day.
Incorporate compromised running drills, where she performs a strength exercise followed immediately by a run. This will help her adapt to the fatigue experienced during transitions in the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Twigg Katy | 2022 Birmingham | 01:39:12 | |
| Goodyear Lucy | 2023 London | 01:40:06 | |
| Gimenez Viktoria | 2023 Paris | 01:39:55 | |
| Anstey Kym | 2024 Singapore | 01:39:21 | |
| Einhart Samantha | 2024 Melbourne | 01:39:22 | |
| Chan Mandy | 2023 Manchester | 01:39:35 | |
| Reichman Nicole | 2023 London | 01:39:18 | |
| Whitehead Yohanna | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:39:51 | |
| Kuhlmann Saskia | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:39:37 | |
| Cullen Debbie | 2023 Dublin | 01:39:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
