Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kerr Justin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kerr Justin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kerr Justin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kerr Justin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:48 | 06:55 to 05:07 | 41.4% |
| Run Total | 01:00 | 44:11 to 43:11 | 23.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:47 | 07:15 to 06:28 | 18.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:38 | 06:00 to 05:22 | 14.6% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:52 to 04:49 | 1.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 02:12 to 02:09 | 1.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:29 to 04:27 | 0.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:37 to 02:37 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Kerr Justin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:39 | 00:00 | 04:45 -00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 04:39 | 04:30 -00:01 | 04:45 -00:06 |
| Running 2 | 04:56 | 09:08 | 05:07 -00:11 | 09:15 -00:07 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 14:04 | 03:01 -00:24 | 14:22 -00:18 |
| Running 3 | 05:18 | 16:41 | 05:34 -00:16 | 17:23 -00:42 |
| Sled Pull | 04:27 | 21:59 | 05:10 -00:43 | 22:57 -00:58 |
| Running 4 | 05:26 | 26:26 | 05:34 -00:08 | 28:07 -01:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:00 | 31:52 | 05:41 +00:19 | 33:41 -01:49 |
| Running 5 | 05:44 | 37:52 | 05:45 -00:01 | 39:22 -01:30 |
| Rowing | 04:52 | 43:36 | 04:53 -00:01 | 45:07 -01:31 |
| Running 6 | 05:35 | 48:28 | 05:36 -00:01 | 50:00 -01:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 54:03 | 02:16 -00:04 | 55:36 -01:33 |
| Running 7 | 05:50 | 56:15 | 05:34 +00:16 | 57:52 -01:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:55 | 01:02:05 | 05:24 +01:31 | 01:03:26 -01:21 |
| Running 8 | 06:47 | 01:09:00 | 06:15 +00:32 | 01:08:50 +00:10 |
| Wall Balls | 07:15 | 01:15:47 | 06:52 +00:23 | 01:15:05 +00:42 |
| Roxzone | 06:18 | 01:29:11 | 07:14 -00:56 | 01:29:11 |
In the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, Justin Kerr delivered a commendable performance, ranking in the top 36% both overall and within his age group. Notably, Justin's total running time stood out as a significant strength, clocking in 23 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, the final running segments suggest a slightly slower pace, which might have been influenced by fatigue from the strength exercises. Justin started with a balanced pace, keeping up with the average, but faced challenges in maintaining it through the race, especially after demanding strength segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lanser Christian | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:29:17 | |
| Roelofs Danny | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:29:31 | |
| Forder Daniel | 2023 London | 01:29:25 | |
| Keane Tony | 2024 Madrid | 01:28:43 | |
| Bretting Eric | 2023 Singapore | 01:28:47 | |
| Stokes Oliver | 2024 Hamburg | 01:29:20 | |
| Ryan Anthony | 2024 Dublin | 01:29:12 | |
| Noonan Conall | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:29:05 | |
| Cano Jose | 2021 London | 01:29:40 | |
| Nehring Thomas | 2021 Leipzig | 01:29:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
