Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Jones Zac's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Jones Zac's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Jones Zac's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Jones Zac's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:55. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 03:37 | 08:45 to 05:08 | 52.3% |
| Run Total | 02:55 | 47:23 to 44:28 | 42.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:15 | 07:04 to 06:49 | 3.6% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:02 to 04:54 | 1.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Jones Zac | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:41 | 00:00 | 04:50 -00:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 04:41 | 04:33 -00:10 | 04:50 -00:09 |
| Running 2 | 05:06 | 09:04 | 05:18 -00:12 | 09:23 -00:19 |
| Sled Push | 02:13 | 14:10 | 03:08 -00:55 | 14:41 -00:31 |
| Running 3 | 05:53 | 16:23 | 05:46 +00:07 | 17:49 -01:26 |
| Sled Pull | 08:45 | 22:16 | 05:23 +03:22 | 23:35 -01:19 |
| Running 4 | 05:51 | 31:01 | 05:45 +00:06 | 28:58 +02:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:42 | 36:52 | 05:59 -01:17 | 34:43 +02:09 |
| Running 5 | 06:17 | 41:34 | 05:57 +00:20 | 40:42 +00:52 |
| Rowing | 05:02 | 47:51 | 04:58 +00:04 | 46:39 +01:12 |
| Running 6 | 06:16 | 52:53 | 05:48 +00:28 | 51:37 +01:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 59:09 | 02:22 -00:09 | 57:25 +01:44 |
| Running 7 | 05:41 | 01:01:22 | 05:46 -00:05 | 59:47 +01:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:33 | 01:07:03 | 05:35 -01:02 | 01:05:33 +01:30 |
| Running 8 | 07:41 | 01:11:36 | 06:34 +01:07 | 01:11:08 +00:28 |
| Wall Balls | 07:04 | 01:19:17 | 07:13 -00:09 | 01:17:42 +01:35 |
| Roxzone | 06:22 | 01:32:37 | 07:42 -01:20 | 01:32:37 |
Zac's best running lap was 00:04:41, indicating a strong running ability. However, there are areas for improvement, particularly in the segments where he lost the most time - Run Total, Sled Pull, Running 8, Running 6, and Running 5.
In conclusion, Zac Jones had a strong performance in the 2023 Melbourne Hyrox race. To further enhance his performance, he should focus on improving his overall fitness, reducing transition time, and strengthening his running ability. Implementing specific training strategies, exercises, and drills tailored to these areas will contribute to his success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mattiacci Joe | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:32:59 | |
| Keller Stefan | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:32:13 | |
| Kounlavong Johnson | 2023 Anaheim | 01:32:52 | |
| Kounlavong Johnson | 2021 Los Angeles | 01:32:27 | |
| Poulhazan Sebastien | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:32:18 | |
| Colclough Will | 2024 Milan | 01:32:14 | |
| Rovea Fabio | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:32:55 | |
| Farhang Amir | 2024 Paris | 01:32:20 | |
| Stilwell Anthony | 2023 Manchester | 01:32:33 | |
| Sanchez Diez Lucas | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:32:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:06 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
