Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 506 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Grace Jack's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Grace Jack's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Grace Jack's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Grace Jack's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:40 | 37:20 to 33:40 | 70.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:45 | 04:41 to 03:56 | 14.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:28 | 03:42 to 03:14 | 9.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:14 | 05:20 to 05:06 | 4.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 01:47 to 01:43 | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 03:58 to 03:57 | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Grace Jack | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:20 | 00:00 | 03:47 +00:33 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:58 | 04:20 | 04:03 -00:05 | 03:47 +00:33 |
| Running 2 | 04:08 | 08:18 | 04:05 +00:03 | 07:50 +00:28 |
| Sled Push | 02:07 | 12:26 | 03:11 -01:04 | 11:55 +00:31 |
| Running 3 | 04:23 | 14:33 | 04:24 -00:01 | 15:06 -00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 04:04 | 18:56 | 05:03 -00:59 | 19:30 -00:34 |
| Running 4 | 04:44 | 23:00 | 04:25 +00:19 | 24:33 -01:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:42 | 27:44 | 03:34 +00:08 | 28:58 -01:14 |
| Running 5 | 04:49 | 31:26 | 04:31 +00:18 | 32:32 -01:06 |
| Rowing | 04:14 | 36:15 | 04:20 -00:06 | 37:03 -00:48 |
| Running 6 | 04:38 | 40:29 | 04:27 +00:11 | 41:23 -00:54 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:47 | 45:07 | 01:56 -00:09 | 45:50 -00:43 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 46:54 | 04:29 +00:35 | 47:46 -00:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:41 | 51:58 | 04:19 +00:22 | 52:15 -00:17 |
| Running 8 | 05:16 | 56:39 | 04:48 +00:28 | 56:34 +00:05 |
| Wall Balls | 05:20 | 01:01:55 | 05:45 -00:25 | 01:01:22 +00:33 |
| Roxzone | 04:48 | 01:11:57 | 04:50 -00:02 | 01:11:57 |
Jack Grace performed commendably at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, achieving an overall rank of 36, placing him in the top 18% of athletes. In his age group, he ranked 11th, placing him in the top 28%. Despite a strong effort, his total running time was 2:11 slower than the average, indicating a potential area for improvement. His performance across strength-based exercises was notably strong, particularly in the Sled Push and Sled Pull segments. However, his pacing strategy suggests that he might have started slower, as indicated by running segments 1 through 4, where times were generally slower than average. This, combined with his strength in exercises, indicates a profile that is slightly more strength-oriented or hybrid rather than purely running-focused.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jenkinson Mark | 2023 London | 01:12:10 | |
| Schmalkoke Thilo | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:11:55 | |
| Walter Tobias M | 2022 Essen | 01:12:17 | |
| Boshoff Gerhard | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:12:04 | |
| Godínez Romero Eugenio | 2024 Mexico City | 01:12:02 | |
| Sheridan Andrew | 2023 London | 01:11:27 | |
| Dewitz Frank | WorldChampionship - Leipzig | 01:12:20 | |
| Lee Tristan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:12:19 | |
| Butaye Romain | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:12:19 | |
| Restituto José | 2023 Stockholm | 01:11:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Taipei | 01:23:46 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
