Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 823 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gmeinder Annika's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gmeinder Annika's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gmeinder Annika's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gmeinder Annika's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 01:38 | 04:04 to 02:26 | 41.9% |
| Run Total | 00:46 | 51:03 to 50:17 | 19.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:35 | 06:59 to 06:24 | 15.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:29 | 03:31 to 03:02 | 12.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:24 | 05:43 to 05:19 | 10.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:02 | 05:47 to 05:45 | 0.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:35 to 06:35 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Gmeinder Annika | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:25 | 00:00 | 05:37 -00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:43 | 05:25 | 05:21 +00:22 | 05:37 -00:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:37 | 11:08 | 06:04 -00:27 | 10:58 +00:10 |
| Sled Push | 03:31 | 16:45 | 03:04 +00:27 | 17:02 -00:17 |
| Running 3 | 06:06 | 20:16 | 06:24 -00:18 | 20:06 +00:10 |
| Sled Pull | 06:59 | 26:22 | 06:34 +00:25 | 26:30 -00:08 |
| Running 4 | 06:25 | 33:21 | 06:26 -00:01 | 33:04 +00:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:35 | 39:46 | 07:23 -00:48 | 39:30 +00:16 |
| Running 5 | 06:49 | 46:21 | 06:39 +00:10 | 46:53 -00:32 |
| Rowing | 05:35 | 53:10 | 05:40 -00:05 | 53:32 -00:22 |
| Running 6 | 06:33 | 58:45 | 06:30 +00:03 | 59:12 -00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 04:04 | 01:05:18 | 02:29 +01:35 | 01:05:42 -00:24 |
| Running 7 | 06:50 | 01:09:22 | 06:28 +00:22 | 01:08:11 +01:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:24 | 01:16:12 | 05:37 -00:13 | 01:14:39 +01:33 |
| Running 8 | 07:22 | 01:21:36 | 07:09 +00:13 | 01:20:16 +01:20 |
| Wall Balls | 05:47 | 01:28:58 | 06:01 -00:14 | 01:27:25 +01:33 |
| Roxzone | 07:04 | 01:41:42 | 08:16 -01:12 | 01:41:42 |
Annika's total running time was 00:51:03, which was 02:00 slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she may need to improve her overall fitness and transition time in order to perform better in the race. Her best running lap was 00:05:25, which was only 00:02 slower than the average.
In conclusion, Annika Gmeinder had a strong performance in the Hyrox race in Munich. To further improve her performance, she should focus on improving her overall fitness and transition time. By addressing the areas of improvement highlighted in the splits analysis and implementing the suggested training strategies, she can enhance her performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Menard Louisa | 2023 Paris | 01:42:11 | |
| Gallagher Caitriona | 2021 Birmingham | 01:41:19 | |
| Tan Dianne | 2023 New York | 01:41:16 | |
| Manning Sally | 2023 London | 01:41:14 | |
| Schulte Marisa | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:42:00 | |
| Blythe Hayley | 2024 Melbourne | 01:42:02 | |
| Lorenzen Selina | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:42:09 | |
| Cundick Emily | 2024 Stockholm | 01:41:26 | |
| Tan Deborah | 2023 Singapore | 01:42:05 | |
| Au Wai Yiu | 2024 London | 01:41:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
