Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gaynor Patrick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gaynor Patrick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gaynor Patrick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gaynor Patrick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:59 | 37:30 to 35:31 | 42.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:40 | 04:27 to 03:47 | 14.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:32 | 02:37 to 02:05 | 11.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:32 | 02:10 to 01:38 | 11.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:22 | 04:01 to 03:39 | 7.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:19 | 03:56 to 03:37 | 6.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:18 | 04:56 to 04:38 | 6.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Gaynor Patrick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:20 | 00:00 | 04:05 +00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:04 | 04:20 | 04:14 -00:10 | 04:05 +00:15 |
| Running 2 | 04:26 | 08:24 | 04:22 +00:04 | 08:19 +00:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 12:50 | 02:30 +00:07 | 12:41 +00:09 |
| Running 3 | 04:24 | 15:27 | 04:41 -00:17 | 15:11 +00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 03:56 | 19:51 | 04:07 -00:11 | 19:52 -00:01 |
| Running 4 | 04:35 | 23:47 | 04:40 -00:05 | 23:59 -00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:01 | 28:22 | 04:11 -00:10 | 28:39 -00:17 |
| Running 5 | 04:51 | 32:23 | 04:47 +00:04 | 32:50 -00:27 |
| Rowing | 04:18 | 37:14 | 04:31 -00:13 | 37:37 -00:23 |
| Running 6 | 04:49 | 41:32 | 04:41 +00:08 | 42:08 -00:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 46:21 | 01:52 +00:18 | 46:49 -00:28 |
| Running 7 | 04:53 | 48:31 | 04:41 +00:12 | 48:41 -00:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:27 | 53:24 | 04:11 +00:16 | 53:22 +00:02 |
| Running 8 | 05:14 | 57:51 | 05:02 +00:12 | 57:33 +00:18 |
| Wall Balls | 04:56 | 01:03:05 | 05:16 -00:20 | 01:02:35 +00:30 |
| Roxzone | 05:13 | 01:13:07 | 05:16 -00:03 | 01:13:07 |
Patrick Gaynor delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, securing the 139th position overall and 30th in his age group, placing him in the top 7% of competitors. Notably, Patrick's strength segments, particularly the Ski Erg and Rowing, were among his best performances, indicating a solid strength foundation. However, his total running time was 00:09 slower than average, suggesting a need to enhance his running capabilities. Patrick's pacing strategy was relatively consistent, with an average start in the initial running segments, though slight fatigue appeared to set in during the later stages. Overall, Patrick appears to exhibit a balanced athletic profile, excelling slightly more in strength-based activities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dunne Archie | 2024 Birmingham | 01:12:51 | |
| Candido Andrea | 2024 Milan | 01:12:46 | |
| Foreman Ben | 2024 London | 01:13:34 | |
| Calvo Iborra Pablo | 2024 Malaga | 01:13:03 | |
| Sarsfield Leigh | 2024 Manchester | 01:12:43 | |
| Karow Steffen | 2022 Hamburg | 01:12:40 | |
| Fischer Eric | 2022 Hamburg | 01:13:11 | |
| Van Brederode Mike | 2024 Gdansk | 01:12:51 | |
| Anders Nils | 2024 Berlin | 01:13:00 | |
| Rodrigues Marco | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:13:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
