Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 243 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gagalka Oliver's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gagalka Oliver's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gagalka Oliver's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gagalka Oliver's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 10:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:43 | 01:04:06 to 56:23 | 71.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:04 | 10:30 to 08:26 | 19.0% |
| Sled Pull | 01:05 | 08:24 to 07:19 | 10.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:57 to 02:57 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:37 to 06:37 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:49 to 08:49 | 0.0% |
| Gagalka Oliver | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:11 | 00:00 | 05:51 -00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:01 | 05:11 | 04:58 +00:03 | 05:51 -00:40 |
| Running 2 | 06:37 | 10:12 | 06:41 -00:04 | 10:49 -00:37 |
| Sled Push | 02:57 | 16:49 | 04:01 -01:04 | 17:30 -00:41 |
| Running 3 | 08:58 | 19:46 | 07:36 +01:22 | 21:31 -01:45 |
| Sled Pull | 08:24 | 28:44 | 07:11 +01:13 | 29:07 -00:23 |
| Running 4 | 08:30 | 37:08 | 07:36 +00:54 | 36:18 +00:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:30 | 45:38 | 08:54 +01:36 | 43:54 +01:44 |
| Running 5 | 08:02 | 56:08 | 08:05 -00:03 | 52:48 +03:20 |
| Rowing | 05:10 | 01:04:10 | 05:41 -00:31 | 01:00:53 +03:17 |
| Running 6 | 08:11 | 01:09:20 | 07:44 +00:27 | 01:06:34 +02:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:25 | 01:17:31 | 03:01 -00:36 | 01:14:18 +03:13 |
| Running 7 | 08:32 | 01:19:56 | 07:48 +00:44 | 01:17:19 +02:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:37 | 01:28:28 | 08:08 -01:31 | 01:25:07 +03:21 |
| Running 8 | 10:07 | 01:35:05 | 09:55 +00:12 | 01:33:15 +01:50 |
| Wall Balls | 08:49 | 01:45:12 | 10:34 -01:45 | 01:43:10 +02:02 |
| Roxzone | 11:14 | 02:05:10 | 11:26 -00:12 | 02:05:10 |
One notable aspect is Oliver's total running time of 01:04:06, which was 05:47 slower than the average. This suggests that he could benefit from improving his overall fitness and his transition time between exercise zones. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:05:11 indicates that he has good speed and potential as a runner.
In conclusion, Oliver Gagalka performed well in the HYROX race, but there are areas where he can make improvements. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as improving explosive power, endurance, and transition time, he can enhance his overall race performance. Implementing these strategies, along with pacing himself and maintaining a balanced training approach, will help him achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Obendorf Marc | 2019 Nürnberg | 02:05:40 | |
| Tang Yi | 2023 Hong Kong | 02:04:59 | |
| Doyle Caolan | 2024 Dublin | 02:05:32 | |
| Ong Chuan Kai | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:05:24 | |
| Kwak Heonsin | 2024 Hong Kong | 02:05:36 | |
| ONan Phil | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 02:04:42 | |
| Harley Paul | 2021 New York | 02:04:50 | |
| Soh Ryan | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:05:38 | |
| Hoose Alexander | 2024 Frankfurt | 02:05:23 | |
| Taylor David | 2023 Houston | 02:05:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
