Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 664 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Dyer Priscilla's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Dyer Priscilla's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Dyer Priscilla's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Dyer Priscilla's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:17 | 39:08 to 37:51 | 36.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:40 | 03:49 to 03:09 | 19.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:26 | 04:31 to 04:05 | 12.4% |
| Rowing | 00:24 | 05:14 to 04:50 | 11.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:19 | 04:24 to 04:05 | 9.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:17 | 03:45 to 03:28 | 8.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:44 to 04:37 | 3.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:29 to 01:29 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:42 to 01:42 | 0.0% |
| Dyer Priscilla | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:24 | 00:00 | 04:26 -00:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 04:24 | 04:48 -00:04 | 04:26 -00:02 |
| Running 2 | 04:39 | 09:08 | 04:44 -00:05 | 09:14 -00:06 |
| Sled Push | 01:29 | 13:47 | 02:22 -00:53 | 13:58 -00:11 |
| Running 3 | 04:54 | 15:16 | 04:59 -00:05 | 16:20 -01:04 |
| Sled Pull | 04:31 | 20:10 | 04:42 -00:11 | 21:19 -01:09 |
| Running 4 | 04:44 | 24:41 | 04:59 -00:15 | 26:01 -01:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:24 | 29:25 | 04:38 -00:14 | 31:00 -01:35 |
| Running 5 | 05:02 | 33:49 | 05:05 -00:03 | 35:38 -01:49 |
| Rowing | 05:14 | 38:51 | 05:02 +00:12 | 40:43 -01:52 |
| Running 6 | 04:48 | 44:05 | 05:02 -00:14 | 45:45 -01:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:42 | 48:53 | 01:57 -00:15 | 50:47 -01:54 |
| Running 7 | 05:11 | 50:35 | 04:59 +00:12 | 52:44 -02:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:45 | 55:46 | 03:50 -00:05 | 57:43 -01:57 |
| Running 8 | 05:31 | 59:31 | 05:14 +00:17 | 01:01:33 -02:02 |
| Wall Balls | 03:49 | 01:05:02 | 03:47 +00:02 | 01:06:47 -01:45 |
| Roxzone | 07:08 | 01:15:49 | 05:15 +01:53 | 01:15:49 |
Priscilla Dyer delivered an exceptional performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, finishing with an overall rank of 57 out of 1801 athletes, placing her in the top 3%. Within her age group of 35-39, she achieved an impressive 11th place, ranking in the top 2% of 378 athletes. Her overall time was 01:15:49, showcasing her competitive edge.
Priscilla demonstrated a strong running profile, with her total running time being 00:39:08, which was 00:50 faster than the average. This indicates that she excels in running, though improvements in strength-based segments could further enhance her performance. Her pacing strategy appeared balanced, as the initial running segments (Running 1 to Running 4) were faster than the average, suggesting a strong start without burning out too early.
By focusing on these areas, Priscilla can enhance her performance and potentially improve her race rankings in future events. Tailored training routines and strategic planning will be key to turning her current challenges into competitive strengths.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Burlton Holly | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:15:22 | |
| Cselko Skye | 2024 Sydney | 01:15:47 | |
| Jenkins KellyAnn | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:15:30 | |
| Tompkins Kayla | 2024 London | 01:15:52 | |
| Schäfer Jil | 2024 Maastricht | 01:15:55 | |
| Frick Lisa | 2023 München | 01:15:26 | |
| Lemper Christina | 2019 Hamburg | 01:16:04 | |
| Thomasson Phoebe | 2024 Perth | 01:15:39 | |
| Diehl Julia | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:15:33 | |
| Folscheid Charlotte | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:16:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Perth | 01:12:59 | |
| 2024 Brisbane | 01:12:01 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
