Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire De Jager Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights De Jager Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the De Jager Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve De Jager Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:32 | 05:01 to 03:29 | 44.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:48 | 04:09 to 03:21 | 23.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:22 | 01:54 to 01:32 | 10.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:18 | 04:35 to 04:17 | 8.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:14 | 03:30 to 03:16 | 6.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:08 to 04:00 | 3.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 01:59 to 01:54 | 2.4% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 33:18 to 33:18 | 0.0% |
| De Jager Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:21 | 00:00 | 03:54 -01:33 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:08 | 02:21 | 04:09 -00:01 | 03:54 -01:33 |
| Running 2 | 04:05 | 06:29 | 04:09 -00:04 | 08:03 -01:34 |
| Sled Push | 01:59 | 10:34 | 02:24 -00:25 | 12:12 -01:38 |
| Running 3 | 04:16 | 12:33 | 04:26 -00:10 | 14:36 -02:03 |
| Sled Pull | 04:09 | 16:49 | 03:51 +00:18 | 19:02 -02:13 |
| Running 4 | 04:20 | 20:58 | 04:25 -00:05 | 22:53 -01:55 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:30 | 25:18 | 03:50 -00:20 | 27:18 -02:00 |
| Running 5 | 04:27 | 28:48 | 04:32 -00:05 | 31:08 -02:20 |
| Rowing | 04:07 | 33:15 | 04:25 -00:18 | 35:40 -02:25 |
| Running 6 | 04:32 | 37:22 | 04:28 +00:04 | 40:05 -02:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 41:54 | 01:46 +00:08 | 44:33 -02:39 |
| Running 7 | 04:27 | 43:48 | 04:27 +00:00 | 46:19 -02:31 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:01 | 48:15 | 03:54 +01:07 | 50:46 -02:31 |
| Running 8 | 04:53 | 53:16 | 04:44 +00:09 | 54:40 -01:24 |
| Wall Balls | 04:35 | 58:09 | 04:54 -00:19 | 59:24 -01:15 |
| Roxzone | 06:28 | 01:09:05 | 04:47 +01:41 | 01:09:05 |
Nick De Jager demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 87 out of 1801 athletes and 17th in his age group. His overall time was 01:10:43, placing him in the top 4% of competitors, which is an impressive feat. His total running time matched the average, indicating a balanced profile with strengths in both running and strength-based exercises.
Nick's pacing across the initial running segments suggests he maintained a consistent speed without starting too fast or too slow. This balanced approach indicates he has a hybrid fitness profile, with no significant advantage in either running or strength but rather a well-rounded capacity.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| De La Cruz Alejandro | 2024 Madrid | 01:09:35 | |
| King Zach | 2024 Manchester | 01:08:41 | |
| Zanirato Michele | 2023 Milan | 01:09:27 | |
| Powell Harry | 2024 Manchester | 01:08:42 | |
| Blokvoort Sybren | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:08:55 | |
| Wilson Joseph | 2024 Madrid | 01:09:29 | |
| Künsler Stefan | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:09:00 | |
| Hackel Christian | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:09:32 | |
| Render Craig | 2024 Manchester | 01:08:51 | |
| Santana Acosta Omar Jesus | 2023 Bilbao | 01:09:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
