Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 738 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:44. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:31 (From 54:46 to 51:15) | 52.2% |
| BBJ | 02:01 (From 09:27 to 07:26) | 30.0% |
| Wall Balls | 01:00 (From 07:03 to 06:03) | 14.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:12 (From 05:49 to 05:37) | 3.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:52 to 04:52) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:35 to 02:35) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 04:57 to 04:57) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 05:17 to 05:17) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:12 to 02:12) | 0.0% |
| Craggs Nicola | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:42 | 00:00 | 05:36 +00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 05:42 | 05:24 -00:32 | 05:36 +00:06 |
| Running 2 | 06:24 | 10:34 | 06:09 +00:15 | 11:00 -00:26 |
| Sled Push | 02:35 | 16:58 | 03:06 -00:31 | 17:09 -00:11 |
| Running 3 | 06:44 | 19:33 | 06:32 +00:12 | 20:15 -00:42 |
| Sled Pull | 04:57 | 26:17 | 06:45 -01:48 | 26:47 -00:30 |
| Running 4 | 06:46 | 31:14 | 06:33 +00:13 | 33:32 -02:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:27 | 38:00 | 07:41 +01:46 | 40:05 -02:05 |
| Running 5 | 06:57 | 47:27 | 06:46 +00:11 | 47:46 -00:19 |
| Rowing | 05:17 | 54:24 | 05:42 -00:25 | 54:32 -00:08 |
| Running 6 | 06:52 | 59:41 | 06:40 +00:12 | 01:00:14 -00:33 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 01:06:33 | 02:33 -00:21 | 01:06:54 -00:21 |
| Running 7 | 06:51 | 01:08:45 | 06:38 +00:13 | 01:09:27 -00:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:49 | 01:15:36 | 05:51 -00:02 | 01:16:05 -00:29 |
| Running 8 | 08:33 | 01:21:25 | 07:30 +01:03 | 01:21:56 -00:31 |
| Wall Balls | 07:03 | 01:29:58 | 06:11 +00:52 | 01:29:26 +00:32 |
| Roxzone | 07:18 | 01:44:13 | 08:36 -01:18 | 01:44:13 |
Nicola Craggs demonstrated a strong performance in the 2024 Paris Hyrox event, finishing in the top 22% of all athletes and in the top 25% of her age group (25-29). Her overall time was 01:44:13, with a total running time of 00:54:46, which was 01:59 slower than the average. Her best running lap was 00:06:24.
Her performance across the various exercises and running segments indicates a balanced profile. She excelled particularly in strength exercises like the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Rowing, and Farmers Carry, where she consistently performed faster than the average. However, her running segments were slightly slower than the average, indicating room for improvement in this area.
Her pacing in the first half of the race (from running 1 to running 4) seems to have been slightly slower than average, suggesting that she started the race at a somewhat conservative pace. Her Roxzone time was 01:15 faster than average, indicating a swift transition between exercise zones.
A more aggressive start in the running segments could help Nicola improve her overall time. While it's essential to conserve energy for later in the race, starting too slow can make it challenging to make up time later. Additionally, focusing on swift and efficient transitions between exercises can further improve her Roxzone time, contributing to a better overall race time.
Specifically, in strength segments like the Burpees Broad Jump and Wall Balls, Nicola should focus on maintaining a steady pace and efficient form to conserve energy and reduce the risk of fatigue or injury. Training that focuses on the specific movements and muscle groups used in these exercises can significantly improve her performance in these areas.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stürzebecher Netti | 2020 Hannover | 01:43:57 | |
| Kennedy Debbie | 2024 Manchester | 01:44:34 | |
| Kube Katharina | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:44:32 | |
| Martín Medina Ana Belen | 2024 Madrid | 01:43:50 | |
| Rubio Pérez De La Vega Gloryte | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:44:07 | |
| Gałat Magdalena | 2024 Poznan | 01:44:33 | |
| Knoop Erika | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:44:16 | |
| Bell Gemma | 2024 Sydney | 01:44:39 | |
| Correia Mercedes | 2024 Glasgow | 01:44:22 | |
| Ferri Callee | 2024 Melbourne | 01:44:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow Craggs Nicola | 02:00:27 | |
| 2024 London Craggs Nicola | 01:45:12 | |
| 2024 Birmingham Craggs Nicola, Smith Libby | 01:40:19 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Craggs Nicola
