Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 568 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Beggs Sarah's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Beggs Sarah's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Beggs Sarah's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Beggs Sarah's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 12:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 12:28 | 01:05:05 to 52:37 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:33 to 01:33 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:04 to 07:04 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:03 to 02:03 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:26 to 05:26 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Beggs Sarah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:47 | 00:00 | 05:39 +01:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:47 | 06:47 | 05:27 -00:40 | 05:39 +01:08 |
| Running 2 | 07:21 | 11:34 | 06:21 +01:00 | 11:06 +00:28 |
| Sled Push | 01:33 | 18:55 | 03:19 -01:46 | 17:27 +01:28 |
| Running 3 | 07:41 | 20:28 | 06:44 +00:57 | 20:46 -00:18 |
| Sled Pull | 04:05 | 28:09 | 07:01 -02:56 | 27:30 +00:39 |
| Running 4 | 08:01 | 32:14 | 06:48 +01:13 | 34:31 -02:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:04 | 40:15 | 07:59 -00:55 | 41:19 -01:04 |
| Running 5 | 08:36 | 47:19 | 07:03 +01:33 | 49:18 -01:59 |
| Rowing | 05:02 | 55:55 | 05:46 -00:44 | 56:21 -00:26 |
| Running 6 | 08:43 | 01:00:57 | 06:54 +01:49 | 01:02:07 -01:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 01:09:40 | 02:38 -00:35 | 01:09:01 +00:39 |
| Running 7 | 08:44 | 01:11:43 | 06:51 +01:53 | 01:11:39 +00:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:26 | 01:20:27 | 06:02 -00:36 | 01:18:30 +01:57 |
| Running 8 | 09:15 | 01:25:53 | 07:41 +01:34 | 01:24:32 +01:21 |
| Wall Balls | 04:27 | 01:35:08 | 06:27 -02:00 | 01:32:13 +02:55 |
| Roxzone | 08:05 | 01:47:32 | 08:52 -00:47 | 01:47:32 |
Sarah Beggs demonstrated a strong performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, achieving a commendable overall rank of 549 out of 1801 athletes, placing her in the top 30%. Within her age group (30-34), she ranked 121 out of 406, which is the top 29%. Her overall time was 01:47:32. Notably, Sarah excelled in strength-based exercises such as the Sled Push and Sled Pull, where she performed significantly faster than average, indicating a strong proficiency in strength-related tasks. However, her total running time was 01:05:05, which is 10:14 slower than the average, suggesting that her running performance could be improved. In terms of pacing, Sarah's initial running segments were slower than average, indicating a possible conservative start. Her profile leans more towards strength, given her superior performance in strength exercises compared to running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ignjatov Vesna | 2024 Cape Town | 01:47:34 | |
| Mittelsten Scheid Celina | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:47:06 | |
| Ciocan Sabrina | 2024 Hamburg | 01:47:23 | |
| O'Hara Rhiannon | 2024 Melbourne | 01:47:54 | |
| Bridgeman Anouska | 2022 London | 01:47:08 | |
| DellPrice Olivia | 2024 Paris | 01:47:11 | |
| Dogantzis Rita | 2023 Chicago | 01:47:18 | |
| Teerlink Fleur | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:47:02 | |
| Hussein Mwana | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:47:08 | |
| Bricker Sienna | 2024 Melbourne | 01:47:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
