Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 803 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Anderson Nathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Anderson Nathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Anderson Nathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Anderson Nathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:47 | 10:35 to 08:48 | 44.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:23 | 08:40 to 07:17 | 34.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:24 | 07:06 to 06:42 | 10.0% |
| Rowing | 00:23 | 05:40 to 05:17 | 9.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 02:49 to 02:46 | 1.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:01 | 06:24 to 06:23 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:41 to 03:41 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 48:13 to 48:13 | 0.0% |
| Anderson Nathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:20 | 00:00 | 05:19 +00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 05:20 | 04:47 -00:01 | 05:19 +00:01 |
| Running 2 | 05:43 | 10:06 | 05:59 -00:16 | 10:06 +00:00 |
| Sled Push | 03:41 | 15:49 | 03:43 -00:02 | 16:05 -00:16 |
| Running 3 | 06:10 | 19:30 | 06:36 -00:26 | 19:48 -00:18 |
| Sled Pull | 06:24 | 25:40 | 06:33 -00:09 | 26:24 -00:44 |
| Running 4 | 06:25 | 32:04 | 06:35 -00:10 | 32:57 -00:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:40 | 38:29 | 07:22 +01:18 | 39:32 -01:03 |
| Running 5 | 06:39 | 47:09 | 06:53 -00:14 | 46:54 +00:15 |
| Rowing | 05:40 | 53:48 | 05:19 +00:21 | 53:47 +00:01 |
| Running 6 | 05:40 | 59:28 | 06:39 -00:59 | 59:06 +00:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:49 | 01:05:08 | 02:41 +00:08 | 01:05:45 -00:37 |
| Running 7 | 05:50 | 01:07:57 | 06:40 -00:50 | 01:08:26 -00:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:06 | 01:13:47 | 06:55 +00:11 | 01:15:06 -01:19 |
| Running 8 | 06:31 | 01:20:53 | 08:08 -01:37 | 01:22:01 -01:08 |
| Wall Balls | 10:35 | 01:27:24 | 08:52 +01:43 | 01:30:09 -02:45 |
| Roxzone | 11:06 | 01:48:55 | 09:54 +01:12 | 01:48:55 |
Nathan Anderson's overall performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event placed him in the top 56% of all competitors and top 57% in his age group. His total running time was notably faster than average, suggesting a strong running profile. His pacing strategy appeared effective, as he progressively improved his running segments, particularly from Running 6 to Running 8, indicating potential energy conservation for a strong finish. However, there are opportunities for enhancing his strength-based exercises and transitions, as these areas lagged behind his running performance.
By focusing on these targeted improvements and strategies, Nathan can work towards enhancing his overall race performance and leveraging his strengths in running to achieve better results in future events.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| De Sousa Pierre | 2023 Paris | 01:49:09 | |
| Domenichelli Fabio | 2024 Rimini | 01:48:40 | |
| Barnes Darryl | 2024 London | 01:49:11 | |
| Eymeric Mickaël | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:49:15 | |
| Mitchell Neil | 2024 Birmingham | 01:49:15 | |
| Brown Mark | 2024 Dubai | 01:48:28 | |
| Martinez Herrejon Carlos | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:48:34 | |
| Biggen Sven | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:49:20 | |
| Mieck Marcus | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:48:56 | |
| Weeks Tim | 2022 Dallas | 01:49:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
