Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Amer Eslam's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Amer Eslam's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Amer Eslam's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Amer Eslam's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:45 | 10:13 to 06:28 | 47.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:22 | 06:29 to 05:07 | 17.3% |
| Sled Pull | 01:17 | 06:11 to 04:54 | 16.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:15 | 06:37 to 05:22 | 15.9% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:58 to 04:49 | 1.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:32 to 04:27 | 1.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:50 to 02:50 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 37:52 to 37:52 | 0.0% |
| Amer Eslam | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:58 | 00:00 | 04:45 -01:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 02:58 | 04:30 +00:02 | 04:45 -01:47 |
| Running 2 | 04:33 | 07:30 | 05:06 -00:33 | 09:15 -01:45 |
| Sled Push | 02:50 | 12:03 | 03:01 -00:11 | 14:21 -02:18 |
| Running 3 | 05:01 | 14:53 | 05:33 -00:32 | 17:22 -02:29 |
| Sled Pull | 06:11 | 19:54 | 05:09 +01:02 | 22:55 -03:01 |
| Running 4 | 04:50 | 26:05 | 05:33 -00:43 | 28:04 -01:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:37 | 30:55 | 05:39 +00:58 | 33:37 -02:42 |
| Running 5 | 05:01 | 37:32 | 05:44 -00:43 | 39:16 -01:44 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 42:33 | 04:53 +00:05 | 45:00 -02:27 |
| Running 6 | 05:01 | 47:31 | 05:35 -00:34 | 49:53 -02:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 52:32 | 02:16 -00:18 | 55:28 -02:56 |
| Running 7 | 04:53 | 54:30 | 05:34 -00:41 | 57:44 -03:14 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:29 | 59:23 | 05:23 +01:06 | 01:03:18 -03:55 |
| Running 8 | 05:38 | 01:05:52 | 06:15 -00:37 | 01:08:41 -02:49 |
| Wall Balls | 10:13 | 01:11:30 | 06:50 +03:23 | 01:14:56 -03:26 |
| Roxzone | 07:26 | 01:29:01 | 07:15 +00:11 | 01:29:01 |
Eslam Amer showed a strong performance in the 2024 Manchester HYROX event, ranking in the top 113% overall, and top 120% within his age group. What stood out particularly was his running proficiency. His total running time of 37:52 was 6:30 faster than the average, demonstrating a strong runner's profile. His best running lap was clocked at 4:33. Additionally, Eslam started the race well, with the first four running segments faster than the average time, indicating a good race pace.
There are several areas where Eslam can focus on for improvement. These include:
Given Eslam's strong running proficiency, it would be beneficial for him to maintain this strength while focusing on improving his performance in the strength-based segments. He should aim to conserve his energy during the running segments to allow for more exertion during the strength-based segments. Additionally, practicing the transition from running to strength exercises can help improve his overall time. Eslam should also consider incorporating active recovery techniques during transition periods to maintain his energy levels throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lamprey Jason | 2024 Glasgow | 01:28:55 | |
| Lim Hong Yu | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:28:37 | |
| Mcmillan Callum | 2024 Manchester | 01:28:33 | |
| Jonietz Oliver | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:28:34 | |
| Matthiesen Lars | 2018 Wien | 01:28:46 | |
| Zuccarello Luca | 2024 Rimini | 01:28:51 | |
| Doshi Rajen | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:29:28 | |
| Barascud Thomas | 2024 Marseille | 01:28:37 | |
| Meyer Frank | 2022 Hamburg | 01:29:31 | |
| Bown Jonathan | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:28:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
