Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Beijing using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire 金 戈's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights 金 戈's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the 金 戈's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve 金 戈's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:55 | 54:24 to 47:29 | 89.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:45 | 08:26 to 07:41 | 9.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:45 to 04:39 | 1.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:21 to 02:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:38 to 05:38 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| 金 戈 | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:39 | 00:00 | 05:03 -00:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:45 | 04:39 | 04:38 +00:07 | 05:03 -00:24 |
| Running 2 | 05:55 | 09:24 | 05:32 +00:23 | 09:41 -00:17 |
| Sled Push | 02:21 | 15:19 | 03:21 -01:00 | 15:13 +00:06 |
| Running 3 | 06:14 | 17:40 | 06:06 +00:08 | 18:34 -00:54 |
| Sled Pull | 04:51 | 23:54 | 05:48 -00:57 | 24:40 -00:46 |
| Running 4 | 06:51 | 28:45 | 06:03 +00:48 | 30:28 -01:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:38 | 35:36 | 06:36 -00:58 | 36:31 -00:55 |
| Running 5 | 07:41 | 41:14 | 06:19 +01:22 | 43:07 -01:53 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 48:55 | 05:06 -00:17 | 49:26 -00:31 |
| Running 6 | 07:35 | 53:44 | 06:07 +01:28 | 54:32 -00:48 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 01:01:19 | 02:31 -00:40 | 01:00:39 +00:40 |
| Running 7 | 07:35 | 01:03:10 | 06:07 +01:28 | 01:03:10 +00:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:50 | 01:10:45 | 06:11 -01:21 | 01:09:17 +01:28 |
| Running 8 | 07:57 | 01:15:35 | 07:06 +00:51 | 01:15:28 +00:07 |
| Wall Balls | 08:26 | 01:23:32 | 07:54 +00:32 | 01:22:34 +00:58 |
| Roxzone | 07:06 | 01:38:56 | 08:28 -01:22 | 01:38:56 |
Overall, 戈 金 delivered a solid performance, finishing in the top 36% of 347 athletes and ranking 20th in his age group. Despite a total running time that was 05:53 slower than average, 戈 金 showed a strength in the transition between exercises, as evidenced by a Roxzone time that was 01:20 faster than average. His best running lap was 00:05:55, indicating potential for speed. However, the slower total running time suggests a need for more focus on running in his training. His performance in the early stages of the race, particularly in Running 1 and Running 2, indicates a fast start, but there were significant slowdowns in later stages, suggesting potential issues with pacing and endurance.
戈 金 should consider implementing the following strategies to improve his race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kokri Nav | 2022 Birmingham | 01:39:19 | |
| Loveday Matt | 2022 Birmingham | 01:39:17 | |
| Dunning Shane | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:38:54 | |
| Ricottilli Centeno Johnathan | 2021 Madrid | 01:39:01 | |
| Pieterse Dennis | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:38:28 | |
| Bieniek Damian | 2023 Warschau | 01:38:58 | |
| Mccafferty Daniel | 2024 Dublin | 01:39:16 | |
| See Max | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:38:51 | |
| Woods Graeme | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:39:01 | |
| Rey Michel | 2023 Paris | 01:39:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
