Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Stam Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Stam Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Stam Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Stam Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:44 | 42:39 to 37:55 | 84.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:31 | 04:31 to 04:00 | 9.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:23 | 02:42 to 02:19 | 6.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:30 to 01:30 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Stam Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:33 | 00:00 | 04:18 -00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 03:33 | 04:19 -00:08 | 04:18 -00:45 |
| Running 2 | 04:57 | 07:44 | 04:34 +00:23 | 08:37 -00:53 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 12:41 | 02:39 +00:03 | 13:11 -00:30 |
| Running 3 | 05:16 | 15:23 | 04:58 +00:18 | 15:50 -00:27 |
| Sled Pull | 04:31 | 20:39 | 04:23 +00:08 | 20:48 -00:09 |
| Running 4 | 05:31 | 25:10 | 04:56 +00:35 | 25:11 -00:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:58 | 30:41 | 04:35 -00:37 | 30:07 +00:34 |
| Running 5 | 05:38 | 34:39 | 05:04 +00:34 | 34:42 -00:03 |
| Rowing | 04:20 | 40:17 | 04:37 -00:17 | 39:46 +00:31 |
| Running 6 | 05:33 | 44:37 | 04:58 +00:35 | 44:23 +00:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:30 | 50:10 | 01:59 -00:29 | 49:21 +00:49 |
| Running 7 | 05:44 | 51:40 | 04:56 +00:48 | 51:20 +00:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:07 | 57:24 | 04:31 -00:24 | 56:16 +01:08 |
| Running 8 | 06:30 | 01:01:31 | 05:24 +01:06 | 01:00:47 +00:44 |
| Wall Balls | 04:16 | 01:08:01 | 05:41 -01:25 | 01:06:11 +01:50 |
| Roxzone | 05:31 | 01:17:42 | 05:50 -00:19 | 01:17:42 |
When analyzing Mark's splits, it is evident that he excelled in some areas while struggling in others. His best running lap was impressive, completing it in just 00:03:33, which was 00:36 faster than the average time. He also performed well in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, finishing 00:04 and 00:14 faster than the average, respectively.
However, Mark faced challenges in several running segments, particularly Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, and Running 5, where he was 00:24, 00:17, 00:34, and 00:34 slower than the average time, respectively. These segments were the areas where he lost the most time during the race.
Specific training strategies and techniques for Mark to improve his running performance include:
1. Interval Training: Incorporate high-intensity interval training (HIIT) into his weekly training routine. This will help improve his cardiovascular endurance and speed. Examples of interval workouts include sprint intervals, hill repeats, and tempo runs.
2. Strength Training for Running: Incorporate strength training exercises specific to running, such as squats, lunges, and deadlifts, to improve muscular strength and power. This will help Mark maintain a faster pace and reduce fatigue during the running segments.
3. Transition Practice: Set up transition zones during training sessions to simulate the race environment. Focus on minimizing the time spent in these transition zones, practicing quick and efficient equipment changes.
4. Tempo Runs: Include tempo runs in Mark's training program to improve his lactate threshold and endurance. These runs involve running at a comfortably hard pace for an extended period. Gradually increase the duration and intensity of these runs over time.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the suggested training techniques, Mark Stam can improve his overall performance, particularly in the running segments where he experienced slower times compared to the average. With consistent training and focus on areas of improvement, he can continue to excel in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jončiulis Simonas | 2024 Poznan | 01:17:38 | |
| Mohan Frankie | 2024 Glasgow | 01:17:20 | |
| Dickmeiss Kevin | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:17:47 | |
| Wakeham Simon | 2024 Birmingham | 01:17:52 | |
| Hagedorn Holger | 2022 Essen | 01:17:17 | |
| Gilruth Gary | 2023 Glasgow | 01:18:00 | |
| Zbaeda Monder | 2023 London | 01:18:10 | |
| Joriskes Pieter | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:18:06 | |
| Begic Berin | 2019 Essen | 01:18:03 | |
| Dolan Micheal | 2024 Dublin | 01:17:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:14:26 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
