Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 821 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Roberts Nina's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Roberts Nina's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Roberts Nina's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Roberts Nina's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:03 | 52:06 to 50:03 | 45.9% |
| Wall Balls | 01:08 | 06:50 to 05:42 | 25.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:24 | 05:42 to 05:18 | 9.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:17 | 03:18 to 03:01 | 6.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:17 | 06:39 to 06:22 | 6.3% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 05:48 to 05:36 | 4.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 02:32 to 02:25 | 2.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:42 to 06:42 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Roberts Nina | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:07 | 00:00 | 05:33 -00:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:42 | 05:07 | 05:21 +00:21 | 05:33 -00:26 |
| Running 2 | 06:07 | 10:49 | 06:02 +00:05 | 10:54 -00:05 |
| Sled Push | 03:18 | 16:56 | 03:04 +00:14 | 16:56 +00:00 |
| Running 3 | 06:20 | 20:14 | 06:23 -00:03 | 20:00 +00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 06:39 | 26:34 | 06:35 +00:04 | 26:23 +00:11 |
| Running 4 | 06:43 | 33:13 | 06:26 +00:17 | 32:58 +00:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:42 | 39:56 | 07:17 -00:35 | 39:24 +00:32 |
| Running 5 | 06:58 | 46:38 | 06:37 +00:21 | 46:41 -00:03 |
| Rowing | 05:48 | 53:36 | 05:40 +00:08 | 53:18 +00:18 |
| Running 6 | 06:47 | 59:24 | 06:29 +00:18 | 58:58 +00:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:32 | 01:06:11 | 02:30 +00:02 | 01:05:27 +00:44 |
| Running 7 | 06:44 | 01:08:43 | 06:28 +00:16 | 01:07:57 +00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:24 | 01:15:27 | 05:37 -01:13 | 01:14:25 +01:02 |
| Running 8 | 07:23 | 01:19:51 | 07:10 +00:13 | 01:20:02 -00:11 |
| Wall Balls | 06:50 | 01:27:14 | 05:57 +00:53 | 01:27:12 +00:02 |
| Roxzone | 07:29 | 01:41:24 | 08:15 -00:46 | 01:41:24 |
Nina's total running time of 00:52:06 was 02:25 slower than the average, indicating that she could focus on improving her running abilities. She had a strong start with a best running lap of 00:05:07, which was 00:12 faster than the average. This suggests that she has the potential to excel in running and should prioritize training in this area.
In summary, Nina Roberts demonstrated a strong performance in the 2023 London Hyrox race. To further enhance her performance, she should focus on improving her running abilities, specifically in segments where she lost the most time. Incorporating specific exercises, drills, and training routines tailored to her areas of improvement will contribute to better race times. Additionally, implementing race strategies such as pacing, transition efficiency, and mental preparation will help her achieve her full potential in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Muchnik Yelena | 2019 Miami | 01:41:16 | |
| Rosenberger Jenny | 2023 München | 01:41:09 | |
| Piepenstock Moa | 2019 Essen | 01:41:09 | |
| Contreras Michelle | 2024 Mexico City | 01:41:45 | |
| Gloag Bridget | 2024 Melbourne | 01:41:50 | |
| Lee Nuri | 2024 Incheon | 01:41:43 | |
| Chan Irina | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:41:12 | |
| Joseph Gigi | 2024 Houston | 01:41:17 | |
| Raadmae Madison | 2024 Houston | 01:41:28 | |
| Tan Dianne | 2023 New York | 01:41:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:39:12 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
