Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Peet Mathew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Peet Mathew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Peet Mathew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Peet Mathew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:12 | 41:07 to 37:55 | 55.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:25 | 05:34 to 04:09 | 24.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:29 | 05:38 to 05:09 | 8.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:21 | 04:31 to 04:10 | 6.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 | 02:06 to 01:48 | 5.2% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:34 to 04:31 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:51 to 03:51 | 0.0% |
| Peet Mathew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:47 | 00:00 | 04:18 +00:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:01 | 04:47 | 04:19 -00:18 | 04:18 +00:29 |
| Running 2 | 04:48 | 08:48 | 04:35 +00:13 | 08:37 +00:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 13:36 | 02:38 -00:23 | 13:12 +00:24 |
| Running 3 | 05:28 | 15:51 | 04:58 +00:30 | 15:50 +00:01 |
| Sled Pull | 03:51 | 21:19 | 04:23 -00:32 | 20:48 +00:31 |
| Running 4 | 05:09 | 25:10 | 04:56 +00:13 | 25:11 -00:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:34 | 30:19 | 04:35 +00:59 | 30:07 +00:12 |
| Running 5 | 05:12 | 35:53 | 05:04 +00:08 | 34:42 +01:11 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 41:05 | 04:37 -00:03 | 39:46 +01:19 |
| Running 6 | 05:06 | 45:39 | 04:58 +00:08 | 44:23 +01:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 50:45 | 01:59 +00:07 | 49:21 +01:24 |
| Running 7 | 05:07 | 52:51 | 04:57 +00:10 | 51:20 +01:31 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:31 | 57:58 | 04:31 +00:00 | 56:17 +01:41 |
| Running 8 | 05:33 | 01:02:29 | 05:24 +00:09 | 01:00:48 +01:41 |
| Wall Balls | 05:38 | 01:08:02 | 05:41 -00:03 | 01:06:12 +01:50 |
| Roxzone | 04:12 | 01:17:45 | 05:52 -01:40 | 01:17:45 |
Pacing and Profile:
Based on the splits analysis, Mathew's overall running time of 00:41:07 was 02:49 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time in order to decrease the time spent in the roxzone. Additionally, his running performance was slightly slower than average, suggesting that he could benefit from more focused running training.
In conclusion, Mathew Peet had a strong performance in the 2023 London Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance further. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as incorporating running drills, improving burpee technique, and optimizing transition efficiency, Mathew can work towards improving his overall race performance. Implementing race strategies such as pacing, efficient transitions, and mental preparation can also contribute to a better performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Griffiths Chris | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:08 | |
| Sauermann Patrick | 2024 Köln | 01:17:20 | |
| Le Cornu Reece | 2024 Melbourne | 01:18:14 | |
| Kurbus Dejan | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:17:22 | |
| Gutierrez Ivan | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:17:31 | |
| Buik Christopher | 2024 Melbourne | 01:17:40 | |
| Yee Anthony | 2023 Glasgow | 01:17:23 | |
| Jiménez Vivar Mario | 2023 Madrid | 01:18:04 | |
| Brown Sawyer | 2019 New York | 01:17:35 | |
| Derible Benoit | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:17:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Manchester | 01:18:38 | |
| 2022 Manchester | 01:24:55 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:19:23 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
