Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Noetzel Sandra's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Noetzel Sandra's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Noetzel Sandra's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Noetzel Sandra's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 00:47 | 04:47 to 04:00 | 29.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:41 | 05:54 to 05:13 | 25.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:38 | 04:51 to 04:13 | 23.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:17 | 02:38 to 02:21 | 10.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 02:08 to 02:00 | 5.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 05:00 to 04:54 | 3.7% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 05:12 to 05:08 | 2.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:42 to 42:42 | 0.0% |
| Noetzel Sandra | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:24 | 00:00 | 04:56 +00:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 05:24 | 05:00 +00:00 | 04:56 +00:28 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 10:24 | 05:15 -00:08 | 09:56 +00:28 |
| Sled Push | 02:38 | 15:31 | 02:36 +00:02 | 15:11 +00:20 |
| Running 3 | 05:11 | 18:09 | 05:30 -00:19 | 17:47 +00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 04:14 | 23:20 | 05:21 -01:07 | 23:17 +00:03 |
| Running 4 | 05:16 | 27:34 | 05:32 -00:16 | 28:38 -01:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:54 | 32:50 | 05:35 +00:19 | 34:10 -01:20 |
| Running 5 | 05:24 | 38:44 | 05:40 -00:16 | 39:45 -01:01 |
| Rowing | 05:12 | 44:08 | 05:15 -00:03 | 45:25 -01:17 |
| Running 6 | 05:14 | 49:20 | 05:34 -00:20 | 50:40 -01:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 54:34 | 02:09 -00:01 | 56:14 -01:40 |
| Running 7 | 05:18 | 56:42 | 05:31 -00:13 | 58:23 -01:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:51 | 01:02:00 | 04:26 +00:25 | 01:03:54 -01:54 |
| Running 8 | 05:51 | 01:06:51 | 05:52 -00:01 | 01:08:20 -01:29 |
| Wall Balls | 04:47 | 01:12:42 | 04:28 +00:19 | 01:14:12 -01:30 |
| Roxzone | 07:35 | 01:24:57 | 06:17 +01:18 | 01:24:57 |
Sandra Noetzel performed well in the event, reaching the top 10% of all athletes and the top 12% in her age group. Her overall time was 01:24:57, with a total running time of 00:42:42, which was 01:27 faster than the average. This indicates that Sandra has a strong running profile, excelling in this aspect of the HYROX event.
Her pacing seemed well-maintained throughout the race, with her running times consistently faster than average, suggesting that she maintained a steady, effective running rhythm. The only exception was the first running segment where she was slower than average. It's a common issue for athletes to start slower as they're warming up. However, Sandra managed to quickly adjust her pace in the subsequent segments.
Considering Sandra's strengths and areas for improvement, some race strategies might include:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Alexandra | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:25:13 | |
| Siegert Samantha | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:24:46 | |
| Platt Juls | 2024 London | 01:25:18 | |
| Raben Ines | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:24:51 | |
| Hopkins Morgan | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:25:03 | |
| Carlile Tumerose | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:46 | |
| Gehrig Johanna | 2024 Berlin | 01:25:09 | |
| Kropidłowska Kasia | 2024 Gdansk | 01:24:52 | |
| Montalvo Christian | 2024 Dallas | 01:24:37 | |
| Telford Rochelle | 2023 Melbourne | 01:25:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Hamburg | 01:29:19 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
