Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Minks Ole's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Minks Ole's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Minks Ole's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Minks Ole's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:03 | 46:43 to 42:40 | 83.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:48 | 06:02 to 05:14 | 16.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:36 to 02:36 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Minks Ole | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:56 | 00:00 | 04:41 +00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 04:56 | 04:29 -00:09 | 04:41 +00:15 |
| Running 2 | 06:59 | 09:16 | 05:05 +01:54 | 09:10 +00:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:36 | 16:15 | 02:59 -00:23 | 14:15 +02:00 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 18:51 | 05:33 -00:10 | 17:14 +01:37 |
| Sled Pull | 04:13 | 24:14 | 05:05 -00:52 | 22:47 +01:27 |
| Running 4 | 06:06 | 28:27 | 05:31 +00:35 | 27:52 +00:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:02 | 34:33 | 05:33 +00:29 | 33:23 +01:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:58 | 40:35 | 05:42 +00:16 | 38:56 +01:39 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 46:33 | 04:52 -00:22 | 44:38 +01:55 |
| Running 6 | 05:38 | 51:03 | 05:33 +00:05 | 49:30 +01:33 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 56:41 | 02:14 -00:07 | 55:03 +01:38 |
| Running 7 | 05:26 | 58:48 | 05:32 -00:06 | 57:17 +01:31 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:01 | 01:04:14 | 05:18 -00:17 | 01:02:49 +01:25 |
| Running 8 | 06:20 | 01:09:15 | 06:11 +00:09 | 01:08:07 +01:08 |
| Wall Balls | 04:46 | 01:15:35 | 06:45 -01:59 | 01:14:18 +01:17 |
| Roxzone | 07:56 | 01:28:07 | 07:04 +00:52 | 01:28:07 |
Based on his splits analysis, Ole's best running lap was 00:04:56, which was 00:26 slower than the average. His running performance varied throughout the race, with some segments faster than average and others slower. It is important to note that Ole's running time for the entire race was slower than average, indicating that he may need to focus more on his running training.
Overall, Ole Minks has shown strong performance in certain segments of the race, but there are areas for improvement. By focusing on his running endurance and speed, improving overall fitness and transition efficiency, and implementing race strategies, Ole can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Van Den Tol Tjim | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:28:20 | |
| Foley Adam | 2024 Berlin | 01:27:51 | |
| Van Den Boogaard Mees | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:27:44 | |
| Trujillo Enrique | 2024 Mexico City | 01:27:53 | |
| Collins Chris | 2024 Manchester | 01:28:08 | |
| Camacho Paquet Francisco | 2023 Madrid | 01:27:43 | |
| De Vries Jolle | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:28:33 | |
| Whelan Michael | 2023 Malaga | 01:27:52 | |
| Parkinson Craig | 2024 London | 01:27:46 | |
| De Celis Barroso Ángel | 2023 Malaga | 01:28:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 New York | 01:39:05 | |
| 2024 Copenhagen | 01:18:31 | |
| 2024 Malaga | 01:18:31 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
