Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcconnon Sean's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcconnon Sean's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcconnon Sean's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcconnon Sean's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:29 | 09:54 to 06:25 | 67.6% |
| Run Total | 00:34 | 43:35 to 43:01 | 11.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:15 | 03:06 to 02:51 | 4.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:15 | 02:23 to 02:08 | 4.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:15 | 05:20 to 05:05 | 4.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:39 to 04:27 | 3.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:09 | 05:02 to 04:53 | 2.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Mcconnon Sean | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:43 | 00:00 | 04:46 -00:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:39 | 04:43 | 04:29 +00:10 | 04:46 -00:03 |
| Running 2 | 04:54 | 09:22 | 05:06 -00:12 | 09:15 +00:07 |
| Sled Push | 03:06 | 14:16 | 03:00 +00:06 | 14:21 -00:05 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 17:22 | 05:33 -00:10 | 17:21 +00:01 |
| Sled Pull | 05:02 | 22:45 | 05:07 -00:05 | 22:54 -00:09 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 27:47 | 05:33 -00:10 | 28:01 -00:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:34 | 33:10 | 05:37 -01:03 | 33:34 -00:24 |
| Running 5 | 05:29 | 37:44 | 05:43 -00:14 | 39:11 -01:27 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 43:13 | 04:53 -00:10 | 44:54 -01:41 |
| Running 6 | 05:30 | 47:56 | 05:35 -00:05 | 49:47 -01:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:23 | 53:26 | 02:15 +00:08 | 55:22 -01:56 |
| Running 7 | 05:46 | 55:49 | 05:33 +00:13 | 57:37 -01:48 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:20 | 01:01:35 | 05:23 -00:03 | 01:03:10 -01:35 |
| Running 8 | 06:29 | 01:06:55 | 06:14 +00:15 | 01:08:33 -01:38 |
| Wall Balls | 09:54 | 01:13:24 | 06:48 +03:06 | 01:14:47 -01:23 |
| Roxzone | 05:37 | 01:28:48 | 07:13 -01:36 | 01:28:48 |
In terms of pacing, Mcconnon seemed to have a balanced approach overall. However, his total running time of 00:43:35 was 01:20 slower than the average for his finish time, suggesting that he could benefit from improving his running fitness. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:04:43 was 00:08 slower than the average, indicating that he may have lost some time during that segment.
Additionally, Mcconnon should prioritize his running performance by incorporating specific running workouts into his training routine. This can include interval training, tempo runs, and long-distance runs. It's important for him to gradually increase his running volume and intensity to build endurance and improve his overall running speed.
Overall, by targeting the areas of improvement outlined above and implementing specific training strategies and techniques, Mcconnon can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Watt Jamie | 2023 Dublin | 01:29:17 | |
| Grant Frazer | 2023 Glasgow | 01:29:01 | |
| Starke Nico | 2023 München | 01:28:24 | |
| Geytenbeek Koen | 2023 Valencia | 01:28:58 | |
| Putkowski Damian | 2023 Warschau | 01:28:21 | |
| Diesel Tim | 2022 Berlin | 01:29:07 | |
| Bretting Eric | 2023 Singapore | 01:28:47 | |
| Lysgaard Thomas | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:28:43 | |
| Arnaud Guillaume | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:29:03 | |
| Holland Paul | 2024 Dublin | 01:28:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Dublin | 01:32:53 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:28:35 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
