Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Macklan Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Macklan Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Macklan Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Macklan Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:56 | 43:43 to 39:47 | 76.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:37 | 05:11 to 04:34 | 12.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:34 | 05:03 to 04:29 | 11.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 02:38 to 02:38 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:36 to 01:36 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:34 to 05:34 | 0.0% |
| Macklan Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:05 | 00:00 | 04:28 +00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:10 | 05:05 | 04:23 -00:13 | 04:28 +00:37 |
| Running 2 | 05:09 | 09:15 | 04:46 +00:23 | 08:51 +00:24 |
| Sled Push | 01:56 | 14:24 | 02:46 -00:50 | 13:37 +00:47 |
| Running 3 | 05:17 | 16:20 | 05:10 +00:07 | 16:23 -00:03 |
| Sled Pull | 02:38 | 21:37 | 04:39 -02:01 | 21:33 +00:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:30 | 24:15 | 05:08 +00:22 | 26:12 -01:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:11 | 29:45 | 04:57 +00:14 | 31:20 -01:35 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 34:56 | 05:17 +00:14 | 36:17 -01:21 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 40:27 | 04:43 -00:06 | 41:34 -01:07 |
| Running 6 | 05:31 | 45:04 | 05:11 +00:20 | 46:17 -01:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:36 | 50:35 | 02:05 -00:29 | 51:28 -00:53 |
| Running 7 | 05:33 | 52:11 | 05:09 +00:24 | 53:33 -01:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:03 | 57:44 | 04:50 +00:13 | 58:42 -00:58 |
| Running 8 | 06:10 | 01:02:47 | 05:40 +00:30 | 01:03:32 -00:45 |
| Wall Balls | 05:34 | 01:08:57 | 06:04 -00:30 | 01:09:12 -00:15 |
| Roxzone | 07:12 | 01:21:35 | 06:19 +00:53 | 01:21:35 |
Nick Macklan delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, placing 403rd overall in a field of 1801 athletes, which positions him in the top 22%. Within his age group (50-54), he achieved a remarkable 13th place, ranking in the top 16%. His overall time was 01:21:35. However, his total running time was 00:43:43, which was 02:30 slower than the average, suggesting room for improvement in his running performance. Interestingly, Nick's performance in strength-based exercises such as the Sled Push and Sled Pull was outstanding, placing him in the top 6% and 1%, respectively. This indicates that Nick has a strong strength profile but could benefit from enhancing his running capability. Additionally, his initial running segments indicate a slightly slower start compared to the average, suggesting a conservative pacing strategy.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hollingworth Richard | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:21:42 | |
| Sanders Shane | 2023 London | 01:21:23 | |
| Smidt Jeroen | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:21:32 | |
| Terruzzi Stefano | 2024 Milan | 01:21:50 | |
| Driessens Raphael | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:21:36 | |
| Van Emmerik Paul | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:21:37 | |
| Humps Rene | 2022 Bremen | 01:21:17 | |
| Harrison Markus | 2024 Incheon | 01:21:26 | |
| Forrester Lee | 2022 Manchester | 01:21:57 | |
| Leibrock Bengt | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:21:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:22:50 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
