Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Stuttgart using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kremb Markus's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kremb Markus's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kremb Markus's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kremb Markus's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:57. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:01 | 46:16 to 45:15 | 34.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:42 | 03:47 to 03:05 | 23.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:26 | 02:44 to 02:18 | 14.7% |
| Rowing | 00:24 | 05:21 to 04:57 | 13.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:20 | 04:53 to 04:33 | 11.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:04 | 07:06 to 07:02 | 2.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:19 to 05:19 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:28 to 05:28 | 0.0% |
| Kremb Markus | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:15 | 00:00 | 04:53 +00:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:53 | 05:15 | 04:33 +00:20 | 04:53 +00:22 |
| Running 2 | 05:23 | 10:08 | 05:21 +00:02 | 09:26 +00:42 |
| Sled Push | 03:47 | 15:31 | 03:11 +00:36 | 14:47 +00:44 |
| Running 3 | 05:52 | 19:18 | 05:52 +00:00 | 17:58 +01:20 |
| Sled Pull | 05:07 | 25:10 | 05:29 -00:22 | 23:50 +01:20 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 30:17 | 05:51 -00:04 | 29:19 +00:58 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:19 | 36:04 | 06:07 -00:48 | 35:10 +00:54 |
| Running 5 | 05:52 | 41:23 | 06:03 -00:11 | 41:17 +00:06 |
| Rowing | 05:21 | 47:15 | 05:00 +00:21 | 47:20 -00:05 |
| Running 6 | 05:41 | 52:36 | 05:53 -00:12 | 52:20 +00:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:44 | 58:17 | 02:23 +00:21 | 58:13 +00:04 |
| Running 7 | 05:53 | 01:01:01 | 05:51 +00:02 | 01:00:36 +00:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:28 | 01:06:54 | 05:42 -00:14 | 01:06:27 +00:27 |
| Running 8 | 06:36 | 01:12:22 | 06:41 -00:05 | 01:12:09 +00:13 |
| Wall Balls | 07:06 | 01:18:58 | 07:23 -00:17 | 01:18:50 +00:08 |
| Roxzone | 08:08 | 01:34:06 | 07:53 +00:15 | 01:34:06 |
In terms of his splits analysis, Markus showed strength in the Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, and Sandbag Lunges segments, where he was faster than average. However, he struggled in the Running 1, Ski Erg, Sled Push, Rowing, and Farmers Carry segments, where he was slower than average. These are the areas where he lost the most time during the race.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas for improvement, Markus Kremb can enhance his overall performance in future Hyrox races. It is essential to tailor the training strategies to his specific needs, taking into consideration his age group, nationality, and individual strengths and weaknesses.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cavina Carlo | 2024 Rimini | 01:34:32 | |
| Ash Stuart | 2023 Birmingham | 01:34:02 | |
| Eyckmans Stefan | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:34:21 | |
| Jäger Thorsten | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:33:50 | |
| De Vries Tjeerd | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:34:19 | |
| Rodenas Pérez Modesto | 2024 Malaga | 01:34:30 | |
| Robertsson Göran | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:34:31 | |
| Olivares Luca | 2024 Rimini | 01:34:27 | |
| Elbaloula Kareem | 2024 Stockholm | 01:34:18 | |
| Van Engeland Stefan | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:34:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:33:45 | |
| 2022 München | 01:41:27 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
