Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Dallas using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 746 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Davis Megan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Davis Megan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Davis Megan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Davis Megan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:47 | 55:32 to 50:45 | 61.3% |
| Sled Pull | 01:39 | 08:09 to 06:30 | 21.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:59 | 04:04 to 03:05 | 12.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:23 | 02:51 to 02:28 | 4.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:19 to 06:19 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:32 to 05:32 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Davis Megan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:02 | 00:00 | 05:37 -00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:01 | 05:02 | 05:21 -00:20 | 05:37 -00:35 |
| Running 2 | 06:18 | 10:03 | 06:08 +00:10 | 10:58 -00:55 |
| Sled Push | 04:04 | 16:21 | 03:09 +00:55 | 17:06 -00:45 |
| Running 3 | 07:06 | 20:25 | 06:28 +00:38 | 20:15 +00:10 |
| Sled Pull | 08:09 | 27:31 | 06:45 +01:24 | 26:43 +00:48 |
| Running 4 | 07:15 | 35:40 | 06:32 +00:43 | 33:28 +02:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:19 | 42:55 | 07:34 -01:15 | 40:00 +02:55 |
| Running 5 | 07:49 | 49:14 | 06:43 +01:06 | 47:34 +01:40 |
| Rowing | 05:32 | 57:03 | 05:41 -00:09 | 54:17 +02:46 |
| Running 6 | 07:26 | 01:02:35 | 06:34 +00:52 | 59:58 +02:37 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:51 | 01:10:01 | 02:31 +00:20 | 01:06:32 +03:29 |
| Running 7 | 06:56 | 01:12:52 | 06:34 +00:22 | 01:09:03 +03:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:18 | 01:19:48 | 05:42 -00:24 | 01:15:37 +04:11 |
| Running 8 | 07:42 | 01:25:06 | 07:14 +00:28 | 01:21:19 +03:47 |
| Wall Balls | 04:46 | 01:32:48 | 06:07 -01:21 | 01:28:33 +04:15 |
| Roxzone | 05:30 | 01:43:00 | 08:20 -02:50 | 01:43:00 |
Megan's overall time of 01:43:00 is commendable, but there are areas where she can improve to enhance her performance in future races. Her total running time of 00:55:32 is 05:27 slower than the average. This indicates that Megan could benefit from improving her overall fitness level and reducing her transition time in order to increase her speed and efficiency during the race.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Megan can enhance her performance in future HYROX races. It is important for her to tailor her training and preparation to her specific strengths and weaknesses, and to continue to challenge herself in order to reach her full potential.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Candeias Beatriz | 2024 Bilbao | 01:43:00 | |
| Manning Millie | 2024 Stockholm | 01:43:06 | |
| Johnson Debra | 2022 Chicago | 01:43:00 | |
| Hatfield Steph | 2024 Perth | 01:43:07 | |
| Belforte Antonella | 2024 Turin | 01:43:07 | |
| Habicht Rebecca | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:42:39 | |
| Storey Karen | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:43:26 | |
| Lau Elaine | 2023 Singapore | 01:42:45 | |
| Flickinger Lacey | 2024 Houston | 01:42:45 | |
| Potvin Laurine | 2024 Paris | 01:43:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Dallas | 01:32:54 | |
| 2021 Dallas | 01:43:22 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
