Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 00:45 (From 03:22 to 02:37) | 21.4% |
| Run Total | 00:43 (From 41:31 to 40:48) | 20.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:42 (From 05:12 to 04:30) | 20.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:26 (From 04:46 to 04:20) | 12.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:23 (From 02:22 to 01:59) | 11.0% |
| Rowing | 00:19 (From 05:00 to 04:41) | 9.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:12 (From 06:02 to 05:50) | 5.7% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 04:17 to 04:17) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 04:33 to 04:33) | 0.0% |
| Van Santen Elric | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:45 | 00:00 | 04:32 +00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 04:45 | 04:24 +00:22 | 04:32 +00:13 |
| Running 2 | 04:56 | 09:31 | 04:52 +00:04 | 08:56 +00:35 |
| Sled Push | 03:22 | 14:27 | 02:51 +00:31 | 13:48 +00:39 |
| Running 3 | 05:01 | 17:49 | 05:17 -00:16 | 16:39 +01:10 |
| Sled Pull | 05:12 | 22:50 | 04:48 +00:24 | 21:56 +00:54 |
| Running 4 | 05:14 | 28:02 | 05:15 -00:01 | 26:44 +01:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:17 | 33:16 | 05:05 -00:48 | 31:59 +01:17 |
| Running 5 | 05:03 | 37:33 | 05:25 -00:22 | 37:04 +00:29 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 42:36 | 04:46 +00:14 | 42:29 +00:07 |
| Running 6 | 05:23 | 47:36 | 05:17 +00:06 | 47:15 +00:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:22 | 52:59 | 02:08 +00:14 | 52:32 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:22 | 55:21 | 05:16 +00:06 | 54:40 +00:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:33 | 01:00:43 | 04:57 -00:24 | 59:56 +00:47 |
| Running 8 | 05:50 | 01:05:16 | 05:49 +00:01 | 01:04:53 +00:23 |
| Wall Balls | 06:02 | 01:11:06 | 06:16 -00:14 | 01:10:42 +00:24 |
| Roxzone | 06:31 | 01:23:31 | 06:33 -00:02 | 01:23:31 |
Based on his splits analysis, it is evident that Elric struggled with the running segments, particularly Running 1, Running 2, Running 6, and Running 7. These segments were slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in his running abilities. However, he excelled in segments like the Burpees Broad Jump, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls, where he performed faster than average.
Additionally, Elric should consider adjusting his training focus based on his strengths and weaknesses. If his total running time is slower than average, he should prioritize training for running to improve his overall speed and endurance. Conversely, if his running time is faster than average, he should focus on building strength and power through resistance training exercises.
In conclusion, Elric Van Santen performed well in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his overall performance. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can work towards improving his running speed, strength, and overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sparey Martin | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:23:52 | |
| Edwards James | 2024 London | 01:23:12 | |
| Kralewski Robert | 2023 Warschau | 01:23:52 | |
| Bolz Christoph | 2022 Bremen | 01:23:15 | |
| Paluschek Maik | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:23:12 | |
| Bryant Grant | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:51 | |
| Sapovalov Thomas | 2023 Köln | 01:23:08 | |
| Prini Alessandro | 2024 Rimini | 01:23:42 | |
| Kiene Florian | 2022 Hamburg | 01:23:14 | |
| Doran Alec | 2024 London | 01:23:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Maastricht Van Santen Elric | 01:32:22 | |
| 2021 Amsterdam Van Santen Elric | 01:33:44 | |
| 2023 Maastricht European Championships Van Santen Elric | 01:27:05 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam Van Santen Elric | 01:32:34 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam Van Santen Elric | 01:36:29 | |
| 2024 Paris Van Santen Elric, De Boer Niels | 01:19:48 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam Van Santen Elric, Lansbergen Wilco | 01:13:16 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Van Santen Elric
