Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcconnel Caitlin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcconnel Caitlin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcconnel Caitlin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcconnel Caitlin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:43 | 46:53 to 43:10 | 65.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:00 | 05:17 to 04:17 | 17.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:49 | 06:07 to 05:18 | 14.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:06 to 02:01 | 1.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:03 | 05:04 to 05:01 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:44 to 01:44 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 02:55 to 02:55 | 0.0% |
| Mcconnel Caitlin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:42 | 00:00 | 04:56 +00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 05:42 | 05:01 -00:43 | 04:56 +00:46 |
| Running 2 | 05:33 | 10:00 | 05:18 +00:15 | 09:57 +00:03 |
| Sled Push | 01:44 | 15:33 | 02:35 -00:51 | 15:15 +00:18 |
| Running 3 | 05:45 | 17:17 | 05:33 +00:12 | 17:50 -00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 05:04 | 23:02 | 05:28 -00:24 | 23:23 -00:21 |
| Running 4 | 05:51 | 28:06 | 05:36 +00:15 | 28:51 -00:45 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:07 | 33:57 | 05:41 +00:26 | 34:27 -00:30 |
| Running 5 | 06:05 | 40:04 | 05:43 +00:22 | 40:08 -00:04 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 46:09 | 05:17 -00:24 | 45:51 +00:18 |
| Running 6 | 06:05 | 51:02 | 05:37 +00:28 | 51:08 -00:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 57:07 | 02:11 -00:05 | 56:45 +00:22 |
| Running 7 | 05:49 | 59:13 | 05:37 +00:12 | 58:56 +00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:17 | 01:05:02 | 04:28 +00:49 | 01:04:33 +00:29 |
| Running 8 | 06:07 | 01:10:19 | 05:58 +00:09 | 01:09:01 +01:18 |
| Wall Balls | 02:55 | 01:16:26 | 04:38 -01:43 | 01:14:59 +01:27 |
| Roxzone | 06:49 | 01:26:02 | 06:25 +00:24 | 01:26:02 |
Caitlin Mcconnel's performance in the 2024 Melbourne HYROX race was commendable, placing her in the top 12% overall and in the top 13% within her age group. This indicates a strong competitive edge. Notably, her strength segments were exceptional, particularly the Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Wall Balls, where she ranked within the top 2 percentile. However, her total running time was 2:01 slower than the average, suggesting a need for improvement in running efficiency. Additionally, her pacing started slightly slower than average in the initial running segments, indicating potential for a more aggressive start. Based on these observations, Caitlin exhibits a strong hybrid profile but could benefit from enhanced running performance to complement her existing strength capabilities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Müller Maike | 2019 Hannover | 01:26:18 | |
| Meili Janina | 2024 Berlin | 01:25:42 | |
| Frey Annalena | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:25:37 | |
| Simon Corinna | 2024 Köln | 01:26:20 | |
| Handlos Nadine | 2023 Wien | 01:26:03 | |
| Potes Angelica | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:25:52 | |
| Anderson Kelly | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:26:29 | |
| Casati Stefania | 2023 Barcelona | 01:26:00 | |
| Pitzer Mareike | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:25:53 | |
| Reiners Kathrin | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:26:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
