Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Singapore National Stadium using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:25 (From 46:42 to 44:17) | 48.3% |
| Sled Pull | 01:02 (From 06:09 to 05:07) | 20.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:31 (From 05:01 to 04:30) | 10.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:30 (From 03:29 to 02:59) | 10.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:26 (From 05:45 to 05:19) | 8.7% |
| Rowing | 00:06 (From 04:59 to 04:53) | 2.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 05:20 to 05:20) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:08 to 02:08) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 04:05 to 04:05) | 0.0% |
| Lim Yaoxiang | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:45 | 00:00 | 04:48 +00:57 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:01 | 05:45 | 04:33 +00:28 | 04:48 +00:57 |
| Running 2 | 05:03 | 10:46 | 05:16 -00:13 | 09:21 +01:25 |
| Sled Push | 03:29 | 15:49 | 03:07 +00:22 | 14:37 +01:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:13 | 19:18 | 05:45 -00:32 | 17:44 +01:34 |
| Sled Pull | 06:09 | 24:31 | 05:22 +00:47 | 23:29 +01:02 |
| Running 4 | 05:28 | 30:40 | 05:44 -00:16 | 28:51 +01:49 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:20 | 36:08 | 05:56 -00:36 | 34:35 +01:33 |
| Running 5 | 05:57 | 41:28 | 05:55 +00:02 | 40:31 +00:57 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 47:25 | 04:58 +00:01 | 46:26 +00:59 |
| Running 6 | 05:54 | 52:24 | 05:46 +00:08 | 51:24 +01:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 58:18 | 02:21 -00:13 | 57:10 +01:08 |
| Running 7 | 05:48 | 01:00:26 | 05:44 +00:04 | 59:31 +00:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:45 | 01:06:14 | 05:32 +00:13 | 01:05:15 +00:59 |
| Running 8 | 07:37 | 01:11:59 | 06:31 +01:06 | 01:10:47 +01:12 |
| Wall Balls | 04:05 | 01:19:36 | 07:10 -03:05 | 01:17:18 +02:18 |
| Roxzone | 08:35 | 01:32:08 | 07:40 +00:55 | 01:32:08 |
Yaoxiang Lim demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Singapore National Stadium Hyrox race, finishing in the top 21% overall and in his age group. Despite some slower transitions and exercises, his rank indicates competitive prowess. Notably, he excels in exercises like Wall Balls, where he achieved a 1st percentile rank. His total running time, however, was slightly slower than average, suggesting a need to enhance running efficiency and speed. Yaoxiang appears to have a balanced profile, with room for improvement in both strength-based exercises and running. His pacing was slightly uneven, with a slower start in the first running segment but improved speed in the middle segments, indicating potential for better pacing strategies.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tyburczy Michał | 2024 Katowice | 01:32:33 | |
| Manocchio Frank | 2024 Melbourne | 01:32:21 | |
| Anderson Adam | 2024 Anaheim | 01:32:21 | |
| Sampson Daniel | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:31:54 | |
| Larios Israel | 2024 Mexico City | 01:31:53 | |
| Goh Augustine | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:31:58 | |
| Manzanares Montero De Espinosa Jorge | 2024 Madrid | 01:31:42 | |
| Sandelmann Lars | 2019 Hannover | 01:32:07 | |
| Enwright Paul | 2024 Manchester | 01:32:22 | |
| Gowing Jonathan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:31:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Singapore Lim Terence, Lim Yaoxiang | 01:06:39 | |
| 2023 Singapore Lim Yaoxiang, Foo Thye Soon | 01:20:11 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Lim Yaoxiang
