Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Folie Arndt's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Folie Arndt's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Folie Arndt's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Folie Arndt's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:26 | 42:05 to 40:39 | 53.1% |
| Sled Pull | 01:12 | 05:40 to 04:28 | 44.4% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:44 to 04:40 | 2.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:26 to 02:26 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Folie Arndt | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:37 | 00:00 | 04:31 +01:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 05:37 | 04:24 -00:09 | 04:31 +01:06 |
| Running 2 | 04:49 | 09:52 | 04:52 -00:03 | 08:55 +00:57 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 14:41 | 02:51 -00:25 | 13:47 +00:54 |
| Running 3 | 05:27 | 17:07 | 05:17 +00:10 | 16:38 +00:29 |
| Sled Pull | 05:40 | 22:34 | 04:47 +00:53 | 21:55 +00:39 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 28:14 | 05:15 +00:08 | 26:42 +01:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:41 | 33:37 | 05:05 -00:24 | 31:57 +01:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:22 | 38:18 | 05:25 -00:03 | 37:02 +01:16 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 43:40 | 04:45 -00:01 | 42:27 +01:13 |
| Running 6 | 05:19 | 48:24 | 05:17 +00:02 | 47:12 +01:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 53:43 | 02:08 -00:10 | 52:29 +01:14 |
| Running 7 | 05:19 | 55:41 | 05:16 +00:03 | 54:37 +01:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:59 | 01:01:00 | 04:56 -00:57 | 59:53 +01:07 |
| Running 8 | 04:54 | 01:04:59 | 05:49 -00:55 | 01:04:49 +00:10 |
| Wall Balls | 05:05 | 01:09:53 | 06:17 -01:12 | 01:10:38 -00:45 |
| Roxzone | 08:38 | 01:23:25 | 06:30 +02:08 | 01:23:25 |
Arndt Folie delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Milan Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 454 out of 1371 athletes, placing him in the top 33%. Within his age group (35-39), he ranked 103 out of 297, positioning him in the top 34%. His overall time was 01:23:25, with a total running time of 00:42:05, which was 00:02 faster than the average, indicating a slight edge in running capability. However, his pacing strategy suggests he might have started conservatively, as his initial running segments were slower than average, but he gained speed in the later segments. Arndt has a balanced profile with a slight inclination towards running prowess, but there is significant room for improvement in strength-based exercises and transitions, particularly the Roxzone.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Owens David | 2024 Manchester | 01:23:29 | |
| Nguyen Alexandre | 2024 Marseille | 01:23:48 | |
| Montgomery James | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:23:14 | |
| Polec Daniel | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:23:37 | |
| Salucci Stefano | 2024 Gdansk | 01:23:28 | |
| Ben Tovim Meir | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:23:10 | |
| Russell Dylan | 2023 Birmingham | 01:23:47 | |
| Wardlaw Eddie | 2024 London | 01:23:41 | |
| Schouten Tom | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:23:11 | |
| Scheerle Benjamin | 2019 Hannover | 01:23:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
