Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Dyer Luke's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Dyer Luke's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Dyer Luke's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Dyer Luke's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:09 | 42:51 to 38:42 | 73.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:40 | 05:00 to 04:20 | 11.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:27 | 05:46 to 05:19 | 8.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 02:03 to 01:51 | 3.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:09 | 04:27 to 04:18 | 2.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Dyer Luke | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:11 | 00:00 | 04:21 -01:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:59 | 03:11 | 04:20 -00:21 | 04:21 -01:10 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 07:10 | 04:41 +00:26 | 08:41 -01:31 |
| Sled Push | 01:58 | 12:17 | 02:42 -00:44 | 13:22 -01:05 |
| Running 3 | 05:17 | 14:15 | 05:05 +00:12 | 16:04 -01:49 |
| Sled Pull | 03:58 | 19:32 | 04:30 -00:32 | 21:09 -01:37 |
| Running 4 | 05:33 | 23:30 | 05:04 +00:29 | 25:39 -02:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:00 | 29:03 | 04:47 +00:13 | 30:43 -01:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:50 | 34:03 | 05:12 +00:38 | 35:30 -01:27 |
| Rowing | 04:14 | 39:53 | 04:40 -00:26 | 40:42 -00:49 |
| Running 6 | 05:45 | 44:07 | 05:05 +00:40 | 45:22 -01:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 49:52 | 02:01 +00:02 | 50:27 -00:35 |
| Running 7 | 05:47 | 51:55 | 05:03 +00:44 | 52:28 -00:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:27 | 57:42 | 04:38 -00:11 | 57:31 +00:11 |
| Running 8 | 06:24 | 01:02:09 | 05:33 +00:51 | 01:02:09 +00:00 |
| Wall Balls | 05:46 | 01:08:33 | 05:52 -00:06 | 01:07:42 +00:51 |
| Roxzone | 05:28 | 01:19:38 | 06:04 -00:36 | 01:19:38 |
His total running time of 42 minutes and 51 seconds was 4 minutes and 11 seconds slower than the average for his finish time, indicating a potential area for improvement. Additionally, his performance in Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8 showed room for improvement as he was slower than the average in these segments.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific training techniques and exercises, Luke can improve his performance in the identified areas and enhance his overall race performance in future HYROX events.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Heaney Alan | 2024 London | 01:19:18 | |
| Ballard Alex | 2023 London | 01:19:11 | |
| Muggli Stephan | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:19:58 | |
| Hulshof Johnno | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:19:32 | |
| Hanna John | 2023 London | 01:19:50 | |
| Beck Christian | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:19:22 | |
| Edwards Ben | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:08 | |
| Fuller Brett | 2024 Melbourne | 01:19:51 | |
| Blust Eugen | 2023 München | 01:19:19 | |
| Nowak Paul | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sydney | 01:33:45 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
