Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 191 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Woolf Charlotte's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Woolf Charlotte's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Woolf Charlotte's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Woolf Charlotte's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:19 | 05:46 to 04:27 | 29.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:57 | 05:26 to 04:29 | 21.1% |
| Run Total | 00:46 | 35:44 to 34:58 | 17.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:30 | 03:14 to 02:44 | 11.1% |
| Rowing | 00:18 | 04:55 to 04:37 | 6.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:14 | 03:47 to 03:33 | 5.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 04:38 to 04:25 | 4.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:06 to 01:53 | 4.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:46 to 03:46 | 0.0% |
| Woolf Charlotte | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:09 | 00:00 | 04:02 -00:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 03:09 | 04:33 +00:05 | 04:02 -00:53 |
| Running 2 | 04:23 | 07:47 | 04:16 +00:07 | 08:35 -00:48 |
| Sled Push | 03:14 | 12:10 | 03:16 -00:02 | 12:51 -00:41 |
| Running 3 | 04:41 | 15:24 | 04:35 +00:06 | 16:07 -00:43 |
| Sled Pull | 05:26 | 20:05 | 05:07 +00:19 | 20:42 -00:37 |
| Running 4 | 04:36 | 25:31 | 04:33 +00:03 | 25:49 -00:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:47 | 30:07 | 04:00 -00:13 | 30:22 -00:15 |
| Running 5 | 04:43 | 33:54 | 04:39 +00:04 | 34:22 -00:28 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 38:37 | 04:45 +00:10 | 39:01 -00:24 |
| Running 6 | 04:40 | 43:32 | 04:35 +00:05 | 43:46 -00:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 48:12 | 02:06 +00:00 | 48:21 -00:09 |
| Running 7 | 04:47 | 50:18 | 04:37 +00:10 | 50:27 -00:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:46 | 55:05 | 04:07 -00:21 | 55:04 +00:01 |
| Running 8 | 04:49 | 58:51 | 04:51 -00:02 | 59:11 -00:20 |
| Wall Balls | 05:46 | 01:03:40 | 05:03 +00:43 | 01:04:02 -00:22 |
| Roxzone | 04:33 | 01:13:51 | 04:46 -00:13 | 01:13:51 |
Charlotte Woolf's performance in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race displayed a strong combination of speed and strength. Ranking 10th overall and 1st in her age group, she clearly demonstrated her competitiveness and capability in this challenging event. Her total running time was 40 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. However, her performance in the strength segments, although not significantly slower, could benefit from further attention and training. Notably, Charlotte's pacing appeared generally steady, without any significant dips or spikes.
A few strategies Charlotte could implement in future races include:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Whittingham Caroline | 2024 London | 01:13:56 | |
| Hulme Katrin | 2024 London | 01:13:36 | |
| Mccann Aileen | 2023 Paris | 01:13:51 | |
| Rugloski Kris | 2021 Dallas | 01:13:57 | |
| Lopes Demi | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:14:02 | |
| Dearden Emma | 2024 Birmingham | 01:13:34 | |
| Schlaefcke Lea | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:14:16 | |
| Bland K | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:13:56 | |
| Korn Caroline | 2021 Berlin | 01:13:24 | |
| Feld Simone | 2022 Hamburg | 01:13:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
