Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 135 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rogers Anna's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rogers Anna's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rogers Anna's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rogers Anna's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:29 | 36:30 to 34:01 | 55.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:56 | 05:06 to 04:10 | 20.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:40 | 04:55 to 04:15 | 14.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:28 to 04:21 | 2.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:07 | 03:27 to 03:20 | 2.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:06 | 03:42 to 03:36 | 2.2% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:37 to 04:32 | 1.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:47 to 01:47 | 0.0% |
| Rogers Anna | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:09 | 00:00 | 03:57 -00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 03:09 | 04:28 +00:00 | 03:57 -00:48 |
| Running 2 | 04:23 | 07:37 | 04:12 +00:11 | 08:25 -00:48 |
| Sled Push | 01:54 | 12:00 | 03:04 -01:10 | 12:37 -00:37 |
| Running 3 | 04:50 | 13:54 | 04:31 +00:19 | 15:41 -01:47 |
| Sled Pull | 04:55 | 18:44 | 04:42 +00:13 | 20:12 -01:28 |
| Running 4 | 04:46 | 23:39 | 04:29 +00:17 | 24:54 -01:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:27 | 28:25 | 03:44 -00:17 | 29:23 -00:58 |
| Running 5 | 04:53 | 31:52 | 04:33 +00:20 | 33:07 -01:15 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 36:45 | 04:38 -00:01 | 37:40 -00:55 |
| Running 6 | 04:49 | 41:22 | 04:32 +00:17 | 42:18 -00:56 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:47 | 46:11 | 02:01 -00:14 | 46:50 -00:39 |
| Running 7 | 04:37 | 47:58 | 04:33 +00:04 | 48:51 -00:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:42 | 52:35 | 03:54 -00:12 | 53:24 -00:49 |
| Running 8 | 05:08 | 56:17 | 04:47 +00:21 | 57:18 -01:01 |
| Wall Balls | 05:06 | 01:01:25 | 04:41 +00:25 | 01:02:05 -00:40 |
| Roxzone | 04:45 | 01:11:07 | 04:21 +00:24 | 01:11:07 |
Anna Rogers demonstrated an exceptional performance at the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race, placing within the top 8% of 83 athletes overall and securing the 2nd rank in her age group (30-34). However, there are areas of improvement that can be worked upon to enhance her performance further.
While Anna’s starting pace was impressive, with the first running segment completed 00:47 faster than the average, it appears she may have started too fast leading to slower than average times in subsequent running segments. Her total running time was 00:50 slower than the average indicating a potential opportunity for improvement. In terms of her performance profile, Anna appears to have a balanced hybrid profile, showing proficiency in both running and strength exercises.
The following segments were identified as areas of potential improvement for Anna:
For future races, Anna may benefit from the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rogers Anna | 2024 Manchester | 01:11:07 | |
| Keay Kimberley | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:11:12 | |
| Jones Alice | 2024 Manchester | 01:11:17 | |
| Thomsen Janne | 2022 Maastricht | 01:10:54 | |
| Thielen Xenia | 2024 Hamburg | 01:11:09 | |
| Röthig Sabrina | 2022 Maastricht | 01:11:32 | |
| Astafeva Alena | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:11:19 | |
| Bohlin Yoie | 2023 Stockholm | 01:10:42 | |
| Ardelt Beatrice | 2022 Maastricht | 01:10:41 | |
| Saldh Mia | 2024 Malaga | 01:10:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:06:29 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:14:38 | |
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:08:00 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
