Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 79 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nota Dan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nota Dan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nota Dan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nota Dan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 00:45 | 03:48 to 03:03 | 61.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:16 | 01:58 to 01:42 | 21.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 01:37 to 01:26 | 15.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 03:55 to 03:54 | 1.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:07 to 03:07 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:32 to 03:32 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 30:25 to 30:25 | 0.0% |
| Nota Dan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:37 | 00:00 | 03:23 -00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:55 | 02:37 | 03:56 -00:01 | 03:23 -00:46 |
| Running 2 | 03:41 | 06:32 | 03:33 +00:08 | 07:19 -00:47 |
| Sled Push | 01:58 | 10:13 | 02:02 -00:04 | 10:52 -00:39 |
| Running 3 | 04:00 | 12:11 | 03:44 +00:16 | 12:54 -00:43 |
| Sled Pull | 03:48 | 16:11 | 03:05 +00:43 | 16:38 -00:27 |
| Running 4 | 03:54 | 19:59 | 03:45 +00:09 | 19:43 +00:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:18 | 23:53 | 02:51 -00:33 | 23:28 +00:25 |
| Running 5 | 04:00 | 26:11 | 03:49 +00:11 | 26:19 -00:08 |
| Rowing | 04:06 | 30:11 | 04:07 -00:01 | 30:08 +00:03 |
| Running 6 | 04:07 | 34:17 | 03:47 +00:20 | 34:15 +00:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:37 | 38:24 | 01:31 +00:06 | 38:02 +00:22 |
| Running 7 | 03:58 | 40:01 | 03:46 +00:12 | 39:33 +00:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:07 | 43:59 | 03:04 +00:03 | 43:19 +00:40 |
| Running 8 | 04:11 | 47:06 | 04:02 +00:09 | 46:23 +00:43 |
| Wall Balls | 03:32 | 51:17 | 03:56 -00:24 | 50:25 +00:52 |
| Roxzone | 03:23 | 58:04 | 03:43 -00:20 | 58:04 |
Dan Nota demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Manchester HYROX event, finishing in the top 5 overall and ranking 3rd in his age group. His overall time was 58:04, indicating a high level of fitness and endurance. However, there are areas where improvements can be made.
His total running time was 30:25, which is 23 seconds slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that Dan has a hybrid athlete profile, with strengths in both running and strength exercises. However, he could benefit from focusing more on his running training to improve his overall time.
Dan started the race strong, with a running 1 time that was 45 seconds faster than average, indicating a possible tendency to start too fast. A more steady pacing strategy in the initial stages of the race might be beneficial in conserving energy for the later, more demanding segments.
For better race performance, Dan should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Harrell Ash | 2024 London | 58:06 | |
| Lizarazu Hormilla Aitor | 2023 Madrid | 58:09 | |
| Mason Curtis | 2024 Manchester | 57:57 | |
| Vigo Del Arco Martí | 2024 Poznan | 57:47 | |
| Sánchez Santos Pablo | 2024 Madrid | 57:38 | |
| Woodman Aaron | 2023 Birmingham | 57:40 | |
| Levoy Guillaume | 2024 Bordeaux | 58:05 | |
| Aardenburg Kees | 2024 Amsterdam | 58:33 | |
| Brown Lawrence | 2023 Glasgow | 57:50 | |
| Lousa Tiago | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 57:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Stuttgart | 57:32 | |
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 59:50 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:00:52 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:04:34 | |
| 2022 Manchester | 01:11:06 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
