Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcphillips Jack's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcphillips Jack's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcphillips Jack's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcphillips Jack's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:55. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:15 | 09:51 to 07:36 | 57.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:49 | 06:43 to 05:54 | 20.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:29 | 02:56 to 02:27 | 12.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:19 | 06:39 to 06:20 | 8.1% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:06 to 05:03 | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:57 to 02:57 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:49 to 46:49 | 0.0% |
| Mcphillips Jack | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:08 | 00:00 | 05:03 +00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 05:08 | 04:38 -00:01 | 05:03 +00:05 |
| Running 2 | 05:41 | 09:45 | 05:31 +00:10 | 09:41 +00:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:57 | 15:26 | 03:18 -00:21 | 15:12 +00:14 |
| Running 3 | 06:06 | 18:23 | 06:03 +00:03 | 18:30 -00:07 |
| Sled Pull | 04:32 | 24:29 | 05:46 -01:14 | 24:33 -00:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:46 | 29:01 | 06:02 -00:16 | 30:19 -01:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:39 | 34:47 | 06:34 +00:05 | 36:21 -01:34 |
| Running 5 | 05:52 | 41:26 | 06:16 -00:24 | 42:55 -01:29 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 47:18 | 05:06 +00:00 | 49:11 -01:53 |
| Running 6 | 06:00 | 52:24 | 06:06 -00:06 | 54:17 -01:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:56 | 58:24 | 02:30 +00:26 | 01:00:23 -01:59 |
| Running 7 | 05:31 | 01:01:20 | 06:05 -00:34 | 01:02:53 -01:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:43 | 01:06:51 | 06:10 +00:33 | 01:08:58 -02:07 |
| Running 8 | 06:48 | 01:13:34 | 07:04 -00:16 | 01:15:08 -01:34 |
| Wall Balls | 09:51 | 01:20:22 | 07:53 +01:58 | 01:22:12 -01:50 |
| Roxzone | 08:24 | 01:38:30 | 08:25 -00:01 | 01:38:30 |
Jack Mcphillips' performance at the 2024 Manchester HYROX race demonstrates a distinct aptitude for running. His total running time is 01:32 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. This is further evidenced by his best running lap time of 00:05:31. His pacing throughout the race was largely consistent, with slight variations in certain segments. However, some areas, such as strength exercises, appear to be opportunities for improvement.
Jack's performance in the Wall Balls segment was significantly slower than the average, falling into the 89th percentile. This suggests a need for improved strength and power, particularly in the lower body and core.
Jack's performance in the Sandbag Lunges was also slower than average, highlighting a potential lack of balance and leg strength.
Jack's Roxzone time was slightly slower than average, indicating potential room for improvement in overall fitness and transition times between exercises.
In future races, Jack should consider implementing the following strategies for improved performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ulbricht Sebastian | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:38:54 | |
| Gough Andrew | 2023 London | 01:38:07 | |
| Friederich Malte | 2024 Köln | 01:38:58 | |
| Mcphillips Jack | 2024 Manchester | 01:38:30 | |
| Hawksley Andrew | 2023 London | 01:38:33 | |
| Gómez Guerrero Mauricio | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:38:06 | |
| Catalán Vélez Carlos Bernardo | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:38:07 | |
| Hurley Andrew | 2024 Anaheim | 01:38:18 | |
| Buntenbach Jens Tobias | 2024 Berlin | 01:38:45 | |
| Rückert Konstantin | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:38:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
