Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 307 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Lamont Dan's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Lamont Dan hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Lamont Dan’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lamont Dan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:09 | 08:15 to 05:06 | 36.2% |
| Wall Balls | 03:04 | 10:54 to 07:50 | 35.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:29 | 08:14 to 05:45 | 28.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:49 to 02:49 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:36 to 06:36 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:36 to 02:36 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:30 to 39:30 | 0.0% |
| Lamont Dan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:15 | 00:00 | 04:27 -01:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:02 | 03:15 | 04:22 -00:20 | 04:27 -01:12 |
| Running 2 | 04:41 | 07:17 | 04:57 -00:16 | 08:49 -01:32 |
| Sled Push | 02:49 | 11:58 | 04:13 -01:24 | 13:46 -01:48 |
| Running 3 | 05:08 | 14:47 | 05:33 -00:25 | 17:59 -03:12 |
| Sled Pull | 06:36 | 19:55 | 07:43 -01:07 | 23:32 -03:37 |
| Running 4 | 05:16 | 26:31 | 05:31 -00:15 | 31:15 -04:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:15 | 31:47 | 05:15 +03:00 | 36:46 -04:59 |
| Running 5 | 05:05 | 40:02 | 05:42 -00:37 | 42:01 -01:59 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 45:07 | 04:49 -00:11 | 47:43 -02:36 |
| Running 6 | 05:06 | 49:45 | 05:33 -00:27 | 52:32 -02:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:36 | 54:51 | 02:37 -00:01 | 58:05 -03:14 |
| Running 7 | 05:09 | 57:27 | 05:42 -00:33 | 01:00:42 -03:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:14 | 01:02:36 | 05:55 +02:19 | 01:06:24 -03:48 |
| Running 8 | 05:54 | 01:10:50 | 06:27 -00:33 | 01:12:19 -01:29 |
| Wall Balls | 10:54 | 01:16:44 | 08:13 +02:41 | 01:18:46 -02:02 |
| Roxzone | 06:43 | 01:34:12 | 07:13 -00:30 | 01:34:12 |
Dan Lamont, your performance in the Manchester 2024 Hyrox race was commendable. You ranked in the top 54% of 229 athletes and in the top 51% of your age group (25-29). Your overall finishing time was 01:34:12, and your total running time was significantly faster than the average by 04:33. This indicates that you have a strong runner profile. Your pacing was consistent, and you started the race at a fast pace which you maintained throughout.
However, there are a few segments where you need improvement compared to the 25th percentile. These include the Burpees Broad Jump, Wall Balls, Sandbag Lunges, and Roxzone.
Considering your strengths and areas for improvement, here are a few strategies that can be implemented during the race:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stahl Simon | 2022 Hamburg | 01:34:03 | |
| Nobbs Andrew | 2024 Brisbane | 01:34:38 | |
| Ross Aaron | 2023 Melbourne | 01:34:37 | |
| Morano Johnny | 2019 Wien | 01:33:54 | |
| Knobiel Alexander | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:34:35 | |
| Barnes Nathan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:34:00 | |
| Zeitter Nico | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:33:59 | |
| Aparo Filippo | 2023 Milan | 01:34:14 | |
| Earle Jonathan | 2024 London | 01:33:59 | |
| Banos Olivier | 2024 Turin | 01:34:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:18:54 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:30:05 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
