Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
62 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Pro Women
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 62 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Pro Women
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 62 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Pro Women
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Griffiths Amie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Griffiths Amie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 62 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Pro Women
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Griffiths Amie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Pro Women
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Griffiths Amie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
11:52.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 62 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Pro Women
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Amie Griffiths demonstrated an impressive performance in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox Pro, particularly in her strength-based exercises. Although her overall rank was 80, placing her in the top 96% of all athletes, the areas where she shined were in the strength-based segments such as the Sled Push, Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, and the Sandbag Lunges, where she consistently outperformed the average times.
However, her overall running time was slower than average, indicating a more strength-based profile and suggesting a need for improvement in her running performance. Her pacing in the first four running segments also showed a slower than average start, suggesting possible issues with energy conservation or pacing strategy.
Segments to Improve:
Running Performance
Given her strength in the exercise segments, her overall running time suggests that running training should be a primary focus. Incorporating interval training, such as sprinting for 30 seconds followed by 1-minute recovery jogs, can help improve speed and running efficiency. Long-distance running at a comfortable pace can also build endurance.
Running drills such as high knees, butt kicks, and bounding can improve her running form and efficiency, leading to improved running times.
It is also advisable to include hill training in her running regimen. This type of training can improve leg muscle strength, quicken stride, and increase running economy.
Farmers Carry
This segment was one of her weakest, suggesting a need for improvement in grip strength and core stability. Implementing exercises such as deadlifts, wrist curls, and planks could enhance performance in this area.
Wall Balls
Despite being notably strong in other strength segments, the Wall Balls segment was slower than average. This may indicate a need for improved functional fitness and coordination. Incorporating wall ball drills, squats, and throw-and-catch drills may help to improve in this segment.
Race Strategies:
For better overall performance, Griffiths should consider revising her pacing strategy. A slower start in the running segments might conserve energy for the later stages of the race. Given her strength in the exercise zones, she may also benefit from pushing harder in these segments to maximize her advantage.
Finally, focusing on transition times between exercise zones (roxzone) could lead to improved overall times. Practicing quick transitions between running and strength exercises could help reduce these times.