Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 112 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Greenhalgh Rachel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Greenhalgh Rachel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Greenhalgh Rachel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Greenhalgh Rachel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:28 | 04:44 to 03:16 | 32.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:21 | 05:26 to 04:05 | 29.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:54 | 04:26 to 03:32 | 19.9% |
| Run Total | 00:24 | 33:59 to 33:35 | 8.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 04:37 to 04:19 | 6.6% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 04:37 to 04:31 | 2.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:01 | 02:30 to 02:29 | 0.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:56 to 03:56 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:39 to 01:39 | 0.0% |
| Greenhalgh Rachel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:11 | 00:00 | 03:55 -00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 03:11 | 04:27 +00:10 | 03:55 -00:44 |
| Running 2 | 04:08 | 07:48 | 04:05 +00:03 | 08:22 -00:34 |
| Sled Push | 02:30 | 11:56 | 03:04 -00:34 | 12:27 -00:31 |
| Running 3 | 04:21 | 14:26 | 04:21 +00:00 | 15:31 -01:05 |
| Sled Pull | 03:56 | 18:47 | 04:44 -00:48 | 19:52 -01:05 |
| Running 4 | 04:19 | 22:43 | 04:21 -00:02 | 24:36 -01:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:44 | 27:02 | 03:46 +00:58 | 28:57 -01:55 |
| Running 5 | 04:33 | 31:46 | 04:24 +00:09 | 32:43 -00:57 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 36:19 | 04:39 -00:02 | 37:07 -00:48 |
| Running 6 | 04:25 | 40:56 | 04:21 +00:04 | 41:46 -00:50 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:39 | 45:21 | 02:02 -00:23 | 46:07 -00:46 |
| Running 7 | 04:25 | 47:00 | 04:23 +00:02 | 48:09 -01:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:26 | 51:25 | 03:48 +00:38 | 52:32 -01:07 |
| Running 8 | 04:41 | 55:51 | 04:38 +00:03 | 56:20 -00:29 |
| Wall Balls | 05:26 | 01:00:32 | 04:38 +00:48 | 01:00:58 -00:26 |
| Roxzone | 04:20 | 01:10:09 | 04:33 -00:13 | 01:10:09 |
In the 2024 Manchester HYROX event, Rachel Greenhalgh showed a commendable performance, particularly in running, sled push, sled pull, and farmers carry. Her total running time was faster than average, suggesting a strong runner profile. She was able to maintain a consistent pace throughout the running segments, with minor fluctuations in timing. However, her performance in the strength-focused exercises and the roxzone could be further improved to boost her overall standing.
Rachel might consider a few strategies for better performance in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Anna | 2023 Hamburg | 01:10:17 | |
| Hewitt Kerri | 2023 London | 01:10:32 | |
| Huggins Megan | 2024 London | 01:09:54 | |
| Laue Annika | 2022 Leipzig | 01:09:44 | |
| Scholtz Talitha | 2024 Melbourne | 01:10:17 | |
| Flores Bethany | 2024 Anaheim | 01:10:10 | |
| Naether Rebecca | 2021 Hamburg | 01:09:40 | |
| Vreden Caroline | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:09:55 | |
| Pettrow Jess | 2024 Brisbane | 01:10:02 | |
| Duke Katie | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:09:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
