Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 960 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Greenhalgh Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Greenhalgh Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Greenhalgh Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Greenhalgh Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:39 | 35:24 to 33:45 | 48.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:35 | 04:52 to 04:17 | 17.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:31 | 03:47 to 03:16 | 15.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:24 | 02:18 to 01:54 | 11.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:09 | 03:38 to 03:29 | 4.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:07 to 04:00 | 3.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:07 to 03:07 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:24 to 01:24 | 0.0% |
| Greenhalgh Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:06 | 00:00 | 03:48 -00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:07 | 03:06 | 04:07 +00:00 | 03:48 -00:42 |
| Running 2 | 04:28 | 07:13 | 04:04 +00:24 | 07:55 -00:42 |
| Sled Push | 02:18 | 11:41 | 02:21 -00:03 | 11:59 -00:18 |
| Running 3 | 04:33 | 13:59 | 04:19 +00:14 | 14:20 -00:21 |
| Sled Pull | 03:07 | 18:32 | 03:43 -00:36 | 18:39 -00:07 |
| Running 4 | 04:32 | 21:39 | 04:19 +00:13 | 22:22 -00:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:47 | 26:11 | 03:37 +00:10 | 26:41 -00:30 |
| Running 5 | 04:45 | 29:58 | 04:24 +00:21 | 30:18 -00:20 |
| Rowing | 04:13 | 34:43 | 04:22 -00:09 | 34:42 +00:01 |
| Running 6 | 04:34 | 38:56 | 04:20 +00:14 | 39:04 -00:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:24 | 43:30 | 01:43 -00:19 | 43:24 +00:06 |
| Running 7 | 04:38 | 44:54 | 04:20 +00:18 | 45:07 -00:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:38 | 49:32 | 03:45 -00:07 | 49:27 +00:05 |
| Running 8 | 04:53 | 53:10 | 04:36 +00:17 | 53:12 -00:02 |
| Wall Balls | 04:52 | 58:03 | 04:43 +00:09 | 57:48 +00:15 |
| Roxzone | 04:26 | 01:07:11 | 04:40 -00:14 | 01:07:11 |
Andrew Greenhalgh had a commendable performance in the 2024 Manchester HYROX Race, finishing with an overall rank of 67 out of 211 participants. He showed exceptional performance in his age group (45-49), securing the 3rd position. His total running time was slightly slower than the average (by 01:03), indicating a balanced performance leaning slightly towards strength segments. He started the race with a faster pace, as his running 1 time was 40 seconds faster than the average.
The data suggests that Andrew started the race at a faster pace than the average, which might have led to fatigue in the later stages of the race. A potential strategy for future races could be to start at a steadier pace to conserve energy for the more physically demanding exercise segments and the later stages of the race. He should also focus on optimizing his transition times between exercises, which can greatly improve his overall time. Lastly, monitoring his heart rate throughout the race can help him maintain a sustainable pace and prevent early burnout.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Monahan Colum | 2024 Glasgow | 01:07:14 | |
| Leonardi Roche Raymond | 2024 Dublin | 01:06:43 | |
| Navarro Julien | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:07:05 | |
| Matei Vlad | 2024 London | 01:07:38 | |
| Crinion Des | 2024 Berlin | 01:07:34 | |
| Anderson Matt | 2024 Brisbane | 01:06:54 | |
| Krieg Alexander | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:06:59 | |
| Thewes Kevin | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:07:20 | |
| Pirie Trev | 2024 Glasgow | 01:07:31 | |
| Gregory Steven | 2022 London | 01:07:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Manchester | 01:13:00 | |
| 2023 London | 01:09:43 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:07:46 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
