Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 592 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Fricker Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fricker Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fricker Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fricker Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:35 | 06:11 to 04:36 | 30.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:24 | 05:19 to 03:55 | 27.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:49 | 06:19 to 05:30 | 15.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:46 | 06:49 to 06:03 | 14.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:22 to 04:07 | 4.9% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 04:41 to 04:26 | 4.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 03:21 to 03:17 | 1.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 35:59 to 35:59 | 0.0% |
| Fricker Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:03 | 00:00 | 04:02 -00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 03:03 | 04:09 +00:13 | 04:02 -00:59 |
| Running 2 | 04:32 | 07:25 | 04:27 +00:05 | 08:11 -00:46 |
| Sled Push | 03:21 | 11:57 | 03:36 -00:15 | 12:38 -00:41 |
| Running 3 | 04:36 | 15:18 | 04:51 -00:15 | 16:14 -00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 06:19 | 19:54 | 05:54 +00:25 | 21:05 -01:11 |
| Running 4 | 04:38 | 26:13 | 04:51 -00:13 | 26:59 -00:46 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:19 | 30:51 | 04:11 +01:08 | 31:50 -00:59 |
| Running 5 | 04:43 | 36:10 | 04:56 -00:13 | 36:01 +00:09 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 40:53 | 04:28 +00:13 | 40:57 -00:04 |
| Running 6 | 04:28 | 45:34 | 04:52 -00:24 | 45:25 +00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 50:02 | 02:09 -00:23 | 50:17 -00:15 |
| Running 7 | 04:44 | 51:48 | 04:56 -00:12 | 52:26 -00:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:11 | 56:32 | 04:53 +01:18 | 57:22 -00:50 |
| Running 8 | 05:19 | 01:02:43 | 05:23 -00:04 | 01:02:15 +00:28 |
| Wall Balls | 06:49 | 01:08:02 | 06:28 +00:21 | 01:07:38 +00:24 |
| Roxzone | 04:55 | 01:19:38 | 05:32 -00:37 | 01:19:38 |
Mark Fricker, showed an impressive performance at the 2024 Manchester Hyrox PRO race, ranking 83rd overall and 2nd within his age group (55-59). His overall time was 01:19:38, with a total running time of 00:35:59, which was faster than average by 02:23. This indicates that Mark has a stronger running profile and may benefit from focusing on strength-based training in his routine.
Mark's pacing throughout the race was generally faster than average, particularly during the initial running segment where he was 00:58 faster than the average, indicating a strong start. However, his pace during strength-based segments such as the Sandbag Lunges and Burpees Broad Jump was slower than average, suggesting room for improvement in strength-based activities. The roxzone time of 00:04:55, which was 00:33 faster than average, suggests that Mark was able to recover quickly between exercise zones, indicating good overall fitness and efficient transition times.
Mark should aim to maintain his quick start in the race but also conserve enough energy for strength-based segments later in the race. He could benefit from a strategy that involves a steady pace during the running segments to conserve energy for the strength-based activities. It would also be beneficial to practice transitioning between different exercises to decrease roxzone time even further. Finally, focusing on proper form during strength-based activities will help improve efficiency and reduce fatigue, leading to better performance in those segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sundet Arne | 2024 Stockholm | 01:19:15 | |
| Tihme Alexander | 2024 Berlin | 01:19:59 | |
| Mcavoy Kieron | 2021 Birmingham | 01:20:08 | |
| Mascoe Jesse | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:20:00 | |
| Schroll Richard | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:19:41 | |
| Hindle Nick | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:19:17 | |
| Barbe Cole | 2024 Houston | 01:19:10 | |
| Jochum Cedric | 2022 Basel | 01:20:06 | |
| Essig Richard | 2022 Chicago | 01:19:45 | |
| Grohmann Tim | 2018 Leipzig | 01:19:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:25:52 | |
| 2024 London | 01:19:23 | |
| 2022 London | 01:16:31 | |
| 2023 London | 01:13:22 | |
| 2023 Manchester | 01:24:14 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:27:31 | |
| 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:25:32 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
