Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 681 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Armstrong Oliver's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Armstrong Oliver hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Armstrong Oliver’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Armstrong Oliver's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 00:44 | 04:55 to 04:11 | 36.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:29 | 03:45 to 03:16 | 24.0% |
| Run Total | 00:17 | 33:33 to 33:16 | 14.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:13 to 03:58 | 12.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:12 | 02:03 to 01:51 | 9.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:04 | 03:14 to 03:10 | 3.3% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:20 to 01:20 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:13 to 03:13 | 0.0% |
| Armstrong Oliver | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:11 | 00:00 | 03:43 -00:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 03:11 | 04:06 +00:07 | 03:43 -00:32 |
| Running 2 | 04:22 | 07:24 | 03:57 +00:25 | 07:49 -00:25 |
| Sled Push | 02:03 | 11:46 | 02:18 -00:15 | 11:46 +00:00 |
| Running 3 | 04:24 | 13:49 | 04:12 +00:12 | 14:04 -00:15 |
| Sled Pull | 03:45 | 18:13 | 03:37 +00:08 | 18:16 -00:03 |
| Running 4 | 04:15 | 21:58 | 04:12 +00:03 | 21:53 +00:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:14 | 26:13 | 03:25 -00:11 | 26:05 +00:08 |
| Running 5 | 04:13 | 29:27 | 04:18 -00:05 | 29:30 -00:03 |
| Rowing | 04:08 | 33:40 | 04:20 -00:12 | 33:48 -00:08 |
| Running 6 | 04:25 | 37:48 | 04:13 +00:12 | 38:08 -00:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:20 | 42:13 | 01:41 -00:21 | 42:21 -00:08 |
| Running 7 | 04:20 | 43:33 | 04:12 +00:08 | 44:02 -00:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:13 | 47:53 | 03:35 -00:22 | 48:14 -00:21 |
| Running 8 | 04:27 | 51:06 | 04:29 -00:02 | 51:49 -00:43 |
| Wall Balls | 04:55 | 55:33 | 04:29 +00:26 | 56:18 -00:45 |
| Roxzone | 04:53 | 01:05:13 | 04:26 +00:27 | 01:05:13 |
Oliver Armstrong showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race. Considering his overall rank of 48 out of 211 athletes, he falls in the top 22% performers. In his age group of 25-29, he ranked 17th, putting him in the top 34% within his age group.
Oliver's total running time clocked in at 33:33, which was six seconds slower than the average. His fastest running lap was recorded at 4:13. This indicates that Oliver has a more strength-biased profile and might benefit from additional focus on his running performance. Based on the pacing of the first four running segments, it appears that Oliver started the race faster than average but then slowed down, indicating a potential need to manage his early race energy expenditure more effectively.
For better race performance, Oliver should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hijazo Zabala Francisco Jose | 2024 Bilbao | 01:04:55 | |
| Caballero Nistal Diego | 2023 Barcelona | 01:05:13 | |
| De Graaff Leroy | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:05:24 | |
| Pattison Jack | 2023 London | 01:04:52 | |
| Powell Steve | 2023 London | 01:04:51 | |
| Wentzel Sean | 2024 Cape Town | 01:05:21 | |
| Rascagneres Fabien | 2023 Birmingham | 01:04:59 | |
| Cook Henry | 2024 Manchester | 01:05:34 | |
| Maire Robert | 2023 Köln | 01:05:14 | |
| Francis Joshua | 2024 Birmingham | 01:04:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:14:55 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
