Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tuerlings Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tuerlings Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tuerlings Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tuerlings Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:25 | 45:24 to 40:59 | 92.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 04:35 to 04:21 | 4.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:09 to 02:00 | 3.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:19 to 02:19 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:46 to 05:46 | 0.0% |
| Tuerlings Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:16 | 00:00 | 04:33 +00:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 05:16 | 04:25 +00:10 | 04:33 +00:43 |
| Running 2 | 04:56 | 09:51 | 04:53 +00:03 | 08:58 +00:53 |
| Sled Push | 02:19 | 14:47 | 02:52 -00:33 | 13:51 +00:56 |
| Running 3 | 05:13 | 17:06 | 05:19 -00:06 | 16:43 +00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 04:26 | 22:19 | 04:50 -00:24 | 22:02 +00:17 |
| Running 4 | 05:22 | 26:45 | 05:17 +00:05 | 26:52 -00:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:29 | 32:07 | 05:11 -00:42 | 32:09 -00:02 |
| Running 5 | 05:28 | 36:36 | 05:27 +00:01 | 37:20 -00:44 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 42:04 | 04:47 -00:15 | 42:47 -00:43 |
| Running 6 | 05:21 | 46:36 | 05:18 +00:03 | 47:34 -00:58 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 51:57 | 02:09 +00:00 | 52:52 -00:55 |
| Running 7 | 05:25 | 54:06 | 05:17 +00:08 | 55:01 -00:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:26 | 59:31 | 04:59 -00:33 | 01:00:18 -00:47 |
| Running 8 | 08:27 | 01:03:57 | 05:52 +02:35 | 01:05:17 -01:20 |
| Wall Balls | 05:46 | 01:12:24 | 06:17 -00:31 | 01:11:09 +01:15 |
| Roxzone | 06:02 | 01:24:05 | 06:39 -00:37 | 01:24:05 |
Nick Tuerlings delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 981 out of 3118 athletes and 118 in his age group. His overall time was 01:24:05, placing him in the top 31% of all participants. Nick exhibits a strong hybrid profile, as evidenced by his running and strength segments. However, his total running time of 00:45:24 was 03:03 slower than average, indicating potential for improvement in running endurance and speed. His pacing seemed consistent, except for a noticeably slower Running 8 segment. His strength in resistance exercises such as the Sled Push and Rowing was a highlight, where he notably performed faster than average.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pons Quetglas Llorenç | 2024 Madrid | 01:24:08 | |
| Hage Steffen | 2022 Basel | 01:23:54 | |
| Griffiths Michael | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:01 | |
| Bunyan Bradley | 2024 Madrid | 01:23:45 | |
| Van T Noordende Richard | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:24:34 | |
| Sanctorum Dylan | 2023 Paris | 01:23:44 | |
| Raschke Fabian | 2019 Wien | 01:24:00 | |
| Wylie Jim | 2023 London | 01:24:06 | |
| Zanfardino Antonio | 2024 Milan | 01:23:41 | |
| Russo Cody | 2024 New York | 01:24:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
