Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Matthams Joe's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Matthams Joe's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Matthams Joe's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Matthams Joe's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
04:15.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Joe Matthams put up a commendable performance in the 2024 Manchester HYROX race. Despite falling within the top 58% of athletes overall, and top 59% in his age group, there are several areas where Joe excelled, and others where he can focus on for improvement.
Joe's strength segments were notably strong, with faster than average times in Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Rowing, Farmers Carry, and Sandbag Lunges. This suggests that Joe has a strength-oriented profile.
However, Joe's running performance and transition times (Roxzone) were slower than the average, indicating these are areas that could benefit from focused training. His total running time was 01:24 slower than average, which could be a result of starting too fast in the early running segments, leading to slower times as the race progressed.
Segments to Improve:
Total Running Time: As Joe’s running times were slower than average, a focus on endurance and speed training could be beneficial. Incorporating interval running, tempo runs, and long, slow runs into his training routine would help improve his running endurance and speed.
Wall Balls: Joe was slower in this segment by 01:18. To improve performance in Wall Balls, Joe can incorporate exercises such as squats, thrusters, and kettlebell swings to build lower body and core strength. Practicing the actual movement with lighter weights can also help improve form and efficiency.
Burpees Broad Jump: Joe's performance was slower by 01:08. To enhance this, plyometric exercises such as box jumps, and strength training focusing on legs and core can be beneficial. Regular practice of burpee broad jumps can also increase efficiency and speed.
Roxzone (Transition Times): Joe's transition times were slower than average. To improve, Joe can practice transitioning between exercises during his workouts to become quicker and more efficient. He can also work on his overall fitness level to recover faster between segments.
Race Strategies:
Implementing a few race strategies can also immensely boost Joe's performance:
Pacing: It appears that Joe may be starting too fast in his early running segments. A more conservative start can help conserve energy for the later stages of the race, improving overall running time.
Transition Efficiency: Joe should focus on improving the efficiency of his transitions between exercises. This includes both physical transitions (moving between stations) and mental transitions (preparing for the next exercise).
Strength Training: As Joe's strength segments were faster than average, maintaining this strength while improving his running and transition times could lead to a more balanced, overall performance.