Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:48 (From 06:34 to 05:46) | 42.9% |
| Rowing | 00:34 (From 05:35 to 05:01) | 30.4% |
| BBJ | 00:26 (From 06:36 to 06:10) | 23.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 (From 04:41 to 04:37) | 3.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 03:08 to 03:08) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 04:49 to 04:49) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:08 to 02:08) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 06:38 to 06:38) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 44:02 to 44:02) | 0.0% |
| Liebscher Glen | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:52 | 00:00 | 04:59 -00:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:41 | 04:52 | 04:38 +00:03 | 04:59 -00:07 |
| Running 2 | 04:56 | 09:33 | 05:26 -00:30 | 09:37 -00:04 |
| Sled Push | 03:08 | 14:29 | 03:17 -00:09 | 15:03 -00:34 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 17:37 | 05:59 -00:36 | 18:20 -00:43 |
| Sled Pull | 04:49 | 23:00 | 05:39 -00:50 | 24:19 -01:19 |
| Running 4 | 05:25 | 27:49 | 05:56 -00:31 | 29:58 -02:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:36 | 33:14 | 06:24 +00:12 | 35:54 -02:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:55 | 39:50 | 06:11 -00:16 | 42:18 -02:28 |
| Rowing | 05:35 | 45:45 | 05:04 +00:31 | 48:29 -02:44 |
| Running 6 | 05:34 | 51:20 | 06:01 -00:27 | 53:33 -02:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 56:54 | 02:26 -00:18 | 59:34 -02:40 |
| Running 7 | 05:36 | 59:02 | 06:00 -00:24 | 01:02:00 -02:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:34 | 01:04:38 | 05:57 +00:37 | 01:08:00 -03:22 |
| Running 8 | 06:23 | 01:11:12 | 06:56 -00:33 | 01:13:57 -02:45 |
| Wall Balls | 06:38 | 01:17:35 | 07:45 -01:07 | 01:20:53 -03:18 |
| Roxzone | 12:52 | 01:36:56 | 08:18 +04:34 | 01:36:56 |
Glen's best running lap was 00:04:52, which was 00:02 slower than the average time. His splits analysis shows that he performed better than average in the Running 2, Sled Push, Running 3, Sled Pull, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Farmers Carry, Running 7, Running 8, and Wall Balls segments. However, he struggled in the Roxzone, Sandbag Lunges, Burpees Broad Jump, and Rowing segments, where he lost the most time.
In summary, Glen Liebscher had a solid performance in the 2023 Hamburg Hyrox race. To improve his performance, he should focus on reducing the time spent in the Roxzone, improving his performance in the Sandbag Lunges, Burpees Broad Jump, and Rowing segments, and implementing proper pacing and hybrid training strategies. Incorporating specific exercises, drills, and training routines tailored to enhance performance in these areas will help him achieve his goals.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ziebell Thomas | 2023 München | 01:37:20 | |
| Sperling Gereon | 2018 Essen | 01:37:24 | |
| Flynt Jon D | 2024 Dallas | 01:37:20 | |
| Ibbotson Jordan | 2023 Manchester | 01:36:36 | |
| Fuschelberger Robert | 2023 Hamburg | 01:37:06 | |
| Reimer Jens | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:37:13 | |
| Yarnell John | 2022 London | 01:36:57 | |
| Lavery Glenn | 2024 London | 01:36:41 | |
| Peteri Jani | 2024 London | 01:36:35 | |
| Chrzanowski Artur | 2024 Katowice | 01:36:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Liebscher Glen
