Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Singapore National Stadium using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kerr Scott's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kerr Scott's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kerr Scott's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kerr Scott's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:21 | 42:08 to 39:47 | 62.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:41 | 05:15 to 04:34 | 18.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:21 | 02:52 to 02:31 | 9.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:15 | 02:10 to 01:55 | 6.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:24 to 04:17 | 3.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:53 to 03:53 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Kerr Scott | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:12 | 00:00 | 04:28 +00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 05:12 | 04:23 +00:01 | 04:28 +00:44 |
| Running 2 | 04:54 | 09:36 | 04:46 +00:08 | 08:51 +00:45 |
| Sled Push | 02:52 | 14:30 | 02:46 +00:06 | 13:37 +00:53 |
| Running 3 | 05:07 | 17:22 | 05:10 -00:03 | 16:23 +00:59 |
| Sled Pull | 03:53 | 22:29 | 04:40 -00:47 | 21:33 +00:56 |
| Running 4 | 05:05 | 26:22 | 05:08 -00:03 | 26:13 +00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:15 | 31:27 | 04:57 +00:18 | 31:21 +00:06 |
| Running 5 | 05:13 | 36:42 | 05:17 -00:04 | 36:18 +00:24 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 41:55 | 04:43 -00:09 | 41:35 +00:20 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 46:29 | 05:11 +00:11 | 46:18 +00:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 51:51 | 02:05 +00:05 | 51:29 +00:22 |
| Running 7 | 05:25 | 54:01 | 05:08 +00:17 | 53:34 +00:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:08 | 59:26 | 04:50 -00:42 | 58:42 +00:44 |
| Running 8 | 05:55 | 01:03:34 | 05:40 +00:15 | 01:03:32 +00:02 |
| Wall Balls | 05:05 | 01:09:29 | 06:05 -01:00 | 01:09:12 +00:17 |
| Roxzone | 07:12 | 01:21:36 | 06:19 +00:53 | 01:21:36 |
Scott Kerr delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Singapore National Stadium, securing an overall rank of 104, placing him in the top 7% of all competitors. Within his age group, he ranked 46th, showcasing his competitive edge among peers. Despite a slightly slower total running time — 56 seconds behind the average — Scott excelled in strength-based exercises, notably the sled pull, sandbag lunges, and wall balls, highlighting his robust strength profile. His running segments showed variability, with some faster-than-average times indicating potential for improved pacing strategies. The data suggests Scott may benefit from balancing his training to enhance both running endurance and transition efficiency.
By focusing on these targeted areas and implementing the suggested training strategies, Scott Kerr can enhance his overall performance, balancing his strengths in strength-based events with improved running and transition efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kennedy Brian | 2024 Berlin | 01:21:46 | |
| Craft Ben | 2023 London | 01:21:43 | |
| Lam Cheuk Yui | 2024 London | 01:21:45 | |
| Warncke Ronald | 2020 Hannover | 01:21:45 | |
| Moorkamp Frederik | 2024 Berlin | 01:21:09 | |
| Müller Ralf | 2023 Hannover | 01:21:23 | |
| Renner Simon | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:21:31 | |
| Moss Andrew | 2024 Birmingham | 01:21:17 | |
| Doherty Ruairi | 2024 Malaga | 01:21:29 | |
| Knops Steven | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:21:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
