Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hogea Radu's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hogea Radu's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hogea Radu's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hogea Radu's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:08 | 06:41 to 04:33 | 28.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:53 | 07:48 to 05:55 | 25.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:35 | 06:28 to 04:53 | 21.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:04 | 05:48 to 04:44 | 14.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:45 | 02:46 to 02:01 | 10.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:25 to 04:21 | 0.9% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:44 to 04:42 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:23 to 38:23 | 0.0% |
| Hogea Radu | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:15 | 00:00 | 04:34 -01:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 03:15 | 04:25 +00:00 | 04:34 -01:19 |
| Running 2 | 04:42 | 07:40 | 04:54 -00:12 | 08:59 -01:19 |
| Sled Push | 02:14 | 12:22 | 02:51 -00:37 | 13:53 -01:31 |
| Running 3 | 04:42 | 14:36 | 05:21 -00:39 | 16:44 -02:08 |
| Sled Pull | 06:41 | 19:18 | 04:51 +01:50 | 22:05 -02:47 |
| Running 4 | 04:45 | 25:59 | 05:19 -00:34 | 26:56 -00:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:28 | 30:44 | 05:13 +01:15 | 32:15 -01:31 |
| Running 5 | 05:08 | 37:12 | 05:29 -00:21 | 37:28 -00:16 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 42:20 | 04:47 -00:03 | 42:57 -00:37 |
| Running 6 | 05:14 | 47:04 | 05:20 -00:06 | 47:44 -00:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:46 | 52:18 | 02:08 +00:38 | 53:04 -00:46 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 55:04 | 05:19 -00:04 | 55:12 -00:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:48 | 01:00:19 | 05:00 +00:48 | 01:00:31 -00:12 |
| Running 8 | 05:26 | 01:06:07 | 05:55 -00:29 | 01:05:31 +00:36 |
| Wall Balls | 07:48 | 01:11:33 | 06:21 +01:27 | 01:11:26 +00:07 |
| Roxzone | 05:18 | 01:24:30 | 06:43 -01:25 | 01:24:30 |
Radu Hogea delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 256 out of 1014 athletes, placing him in the top 25%. In his age group of 40-44, he ranked 37th out of 145, maintaining his top 25% status. His overall time of 01:24:30 demonstrates a competitive edge, particularly in the running segments.
Radu's total running time of 00:38:23 was notably 04:10 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. The initial running segments (Running 1 to Running 4) suggest he started the race at a fast pace, consistently outperforming the average times. However, there is room for improvement in strength-based and compromised running scenarios, where his performance lagged compared to the average.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Peters Nils | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:24:41 | |
| Hayles Ed | 2022 Manchester | 01:24:45 | |
| Lee Chengjie | 2023 Singapore | 01:24:28 | |
| Sarodnick Tim | 2022 Essen | 01:24:54 | |
| Wilson Ben | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:57 | |
| Wiegel Eugen | 2022 München | 01:24:12 | |
| Nino De Guzman Joshua | 2023 London | 01:24:37 | |
| Benedetti Alessandro | 2023 Valencia | 01:24:56 | |
| Marsh Nathan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:19 | |
| Lloyd Paul | 2024 Manchester | 01:24:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:34 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
