Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Foster Tom's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Foster Tom's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Foster Tom's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Foster Tom's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:56 | 06:51 to 04:55 | 32.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:36 | 07:34 to 05:58 | 26.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:16 | 06:02 to 04:46 | 21.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:48 | 05:23 to 04:35 | 13.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 02:22 to 02:01 | 5.8% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:46 to 04:43 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:30 to 02:30 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 37:44 to 37:44 | 0.0% |
| Foster Tom | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:31 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 05:31 | 04:25 -00:06 | 04:35 +00:56 |
| Running 2 | 04:24 | 09:50 | 04:54 -00:30 | 09:00 +00:50 |
| Sled Push | 02:30 | 14:14 | 02:51 -00:21 | 13:54 +00:20 |
| Running 3 | 04:40 | 16:44 | 05:21 -00:41 | 16:45 -00:01 |
| Sled Pull | 05:23 | 21:24 | 04:50 +00:33 | 22:06 -00:42 |
| Running 4 | 04:53 | 26:47 | 05:20 -00:27 | 26:56 -00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:51 | 31:40 | 05:13 +01:38 | 32:16 -00:36 |
| Running 5 | 04:57 | 38:31 | 05:30 -00:33 | 37:29 +01:02 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 43:28 | 04:47 -00:01 | 42:59 +00:29 |
| Running 6 | 04:46 | 48:14 | 05:21 -00:35 | 47:46 +00:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:22 | 53:00 | 02:08 +00:14 | 53:07 -00:07 |
| Running 7 | 04:41 | 55:22 | 05:20 -00:39 | 55:15 +00:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:02 | 01:00:03 | 05:01 +01:01 | 01:00:35 -00:32 |
| Running 8 | 03:56 | 01:06:05 | 05:55 -01:59 | 01:05:36 +00:29 |
| Wall Balls | 07:34 | 01:10:01 | 06:23 +01:11 | 01:11:31 -01:30 |
| Roxzone | 07:10 | 01:24:36 | 06:42 +00:28 | 01:24:36 |
Tom Foster delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Milan Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 505, which places him in the top 36% of athletes. This achievement is notable, particularly in his age group, where he ranks 150th, placing him in the top 43%. His total running time of 00:37:44 was significantly faster than average by 04:55, suggesting a strong running capability. However, the initial running segment was slower than average, indicating a conservative start. His best running lap, 00:03:56, was outstanding, demonstrating his potential as a strong runner. The results suggest Tom has a runner profile and could benefit from enhancing his strength elements to balance his overall performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Burke Jack | 2024 London | 01:25:05 | |
| Plater Euan | 2023 Birmingham | 01:24:08 | |
| Speechley Stuart | 2023 London | 01:24:41 | |
| Cheatham Ernie | 2023 Anaheim | 01:24:25 | |
| Paulley Adam | 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:28 | |
| Ruf Manuel | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:25:00 | |
| Jones Harry | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:54 | |
| Dathe Patrick | 2022 Berlin | 01:24:30 | |
| Keskinen Darren | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:40 | |
| Jones Stuart | 2023 Glasgow | 01:24:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
