Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Chevalier Nathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Chevalier Nathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Chevalier Nathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Chevalier Nathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:23 | 43:02 to 41:39 | 55.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:48 | 05:48 to 05:00 | 31.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:13 | 04:51 to 04:38 | 8.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:05 | 06:08 to 06:03 | 3.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:02 | 04:52 to 04:50 | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:38 to 02:38 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Chevalier Nathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:42 | 00:00 | 04:37 +00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:16 | 04:42 | 04:27 -00:11 | 04:37 +00:05 |
| Running 2 | 05:13 | 08:58 | 04:58 +00:15 | 09:04 -00:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:38 | 14:11 | 02:55 -00:17 | 14:02 +00:09 |
| Running 3 | 05:24 | 16:49 | 05:24 +00:00 | 16:57 -00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 04:51 | 22:13 | 04:58 -00:07 | 22:21 -00:08 |
| Running 4 | 05:34 | 27:04 | 05:23 +00:11 | 27:19 -00:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:48 | 32:38 | 05:19 +00:29 | 32:42 -00:04 |
| Running 5 | 05:21 | 38:26 | 05:34 -00:13 | 38:01 +00:25 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 43:47 | 04:49 -00:19 | 43:35 +00:12 |
| Running 6 | 05:41 | 48:17 | 05:26 +00:15 | 48:24 -00:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 53:58 | 02:11 -00:12 | 53:50 +00:08 |
| Running 7 | 05:29 | 55:57 | 05:24 +00:05 | 56:01 -00:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:52 | 01:01:26 | 05:06 -00:14 | 01:01:25 +00:01 |
| Running 8 | 05:41 | 01:06:18 | 06:01 -00:20 | 01:06:31 -00:13 |
| Wall Balls | 06:08 | 01:11:59 | 06:31 -00:23 | 01:12:32 -00:33 |
| Roxzone | 07:59 | 01:25:58 | 06:55 +01:04 | 01:25:58 |
Nathan Chevalier demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Paris Hyrox race, finishing in the top 49% of 1579 athletes. His performance was particularly strong in the Ski Erg and Rowing segments where he finished significantly faster than average. However, his overall running time was 01:31 slower than the average, indicating a potential area for improvement. Nathan showed a more strength-based profile and could benefit from additional running training. His pacing appeared slightly inconsistent, as he started slower than average in the first running segment but was faster in the later segments. This could suggest a need for improved endurance and pacing strategies.
The following segments have been identified as areas where Nathan can make significant improvements:
For improved performance in future races, Nathan might consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| D'Assaro Andrea Giulio | 2024 Milan | 01:26:11 | |
| Gallardo Andres | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:26:02 | |
| Azulay Simon | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:26:04 | |
| Penwright Josh | 2024 Manchester | 01:25:54 | |
| Maclaine Mike | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:29 | |
| Hungbin Chen HKGHYROX | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:25:32 | |
| Le Deaut Aurélien | 2024 Paris | 01:25:41 | |
| Mahfouz Ahmad | 2023 Barcelona | 01:26:07 | |
| Grant Michael | 2023 Birmingham | 01:25:54 | |
| Hoebinger Stefan | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:25:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
